BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80D(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9Chandigarh9Jaipur8Hyderabad6Kolkata6Bangalore4Delhi4Visakhapatnam2Chennai2Nagpur2Ahmedabad2Panaji1Indore1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 684Section 10(38)4Capital Gains2Long Term Capital Gains2Bogus/Accommodation Entry2Penny Stock2Exemption2Addition to Income2

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

ITA 410/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

2% to 20% of exempt income-Revenue submitted that provisions of Rule 8D were applicable from AY 2008-09 onwards and hence disallowance to be made U/s. 14A was required to be examined in terms of Rule 8D-Held, provisions of Rule 8D are applicable from AU 2008-09 and onwards-AO can determine amount of disallowance in terms

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 411/NAG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur
25 Feb 2025
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

80D only if he is not satisfied with correctness of claim of the assessee, that too, after having regard to accounts of assessee-In instant cases, assessee is putting forth its contention against disallowance from different angles-Some of contentions were raised for first time before Tribunal-Contentions of assessee can be appreciated only if relevant facts are available