BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai48Delhi16Kolkata11Chandigarh10Jaipur9Bangalore8Ahmedabad7Hyderabad7Chennai4Calcutta4Rajkot3Indore3Visakhapatnam2Nagpur2Agra2Pune2Jodhpur1Karnataka1Raipur1Panaji1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 684Section 10(38)4Capital Gains2Long Term Capital Gains2Bogus/Accommodation Entry2Penny Stock2Exemption2Addition to Income2

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

ITA 410/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

80D only if he is not satisfied with correctness of claim of the assessee, that too, after having regard to accounts of assessee-In instant cases, assessee is putting forth its contention against disallowance from different angles-Some of contentions were raised for first time before Tribunal-Contentions of assessee can be appreciated only if relevant facts are available

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 411/NAG/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed
ITAT Nagpur
25 Feb 2025
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

80D only if he is not satisfied with correctness of claim of the assessee, that too, after having regard to accounts of assessee-In instant cases, assessee is putting forth its contention against disallowance from different angles-Some of contentions were raised for first time before Tribunal-Contentions of assessee can be appreciated only if relevant facts are available