BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 747clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi219Mumbai199Ahmedabad63Jaipur47Kolkata36Chennai34Bangalore30Pune29Chandigarh22Indore12Visakhapatnam11Hyderabad11Lucknow10Surat8Cuttack7Amritsar5Ranchi4Panaji4Nagpur3Rajkot3SC3Agra2Patna2Raipur2Cochin2Jodhpur1Guwahati1Calcutta1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(iii)4Section 14A4Section 143(3)3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 272A(1)(d)2

ACIT, AKOLA CIRCLE,, AKOLA vs. SHRI DNYANDEO NINU PATIL,, AKOLA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee as well as cross appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 529/NAG/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Mar 2019AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri S. C. Thakar, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri U. U. Kasar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

747/–. In the assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act, the Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs.1,20,80,845/– on account of interest on IDBI FDR loan. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.1,36,30,590/–. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee

SHRI DNYANDEO NINU PATIL,AKOLA vs. THE DY. CIT- AKOLA CIRCLE,, AKOLA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee as well as cross appeal filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 20/NAG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Mar 2019AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri S. C. Thakar, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri U. U. Kasar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

747/–. In the assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act, the Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs.1,20,80,845/– on account of interest on IDBI FDR loan. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.1,36,30,590/–. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee

BUCCS LTD. AND NBC AND JV,BULDHANA vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 67/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalkFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 32(1)(ii)

disallowances of AO 10 percent evidences reduced the loss as the of the expenses of Rs.60,30,992/- on claimed in the return of income by ad hoc basis made and the Ld. CIT(A) the Appellant of 10 percent of the erred in confirming the same. total expenses for which the Appellant did not provide proper evidence