BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 690clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai499Delhi408Chennai180Kolkata122Bangalore100Ahmedabad92Hyderabad64Pune52Jaipur50Surat44Lucknow26Indore22Chandigarh22Cochin15Visakhapatnam12Cuttack12Raipur10Guwahati10Rajkot9Karnataka8Ranchi6Agra6Jodhpur5Amritsar4Varanasi3SC3Nagpur2Allahabad1Patna1Jabalpur1Himachal Pradesh1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 26311Section 143(3)4Addition to Income2

TAJSHREE AUTOWHEELS PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 400/NAG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur04 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Madhav VichoreFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(viib)

disallowed and added back to the total income of the assessee under the head 'Income from Other Sources'. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 initiated separately for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.” 6 Tajshree Autowheels Pvt. Ltd. ITA no.400/Nag./2024 6. Consequent upon the assessment order so passed by the Assessing Officer, the assessee being

LAXMAN PANDURANG DUDHE,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL C.I.T. -2, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 177/NAG/2017[]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Jan 2018

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Mahavir Singh

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gitesh Kumar, Senior DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 50C

disallowance of dalali expenses. For this, the assessee has raised following six grounds :- “1. The notice issued u/s 263 and the order passed u/s 263 are illegal as the same are not in conformity to the basic requirements of section 263. 2. Without prejudice to above, the notice and proceedings u/s 263 are invalid as the order passed