BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

80 results for “disallowance”+ Section 56(2)(viii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi990Mumbai858Bangalore298Ahmedabad188Kolkata126Jaipur124Chennai124Cochin116Chandigarh104Indore100Hyderabad92Nagpur80Pune63Cuttack53Guwahati47Visakhapatnam40Calcutta39Rajkot34Ranchi33Surat31Lucknow31Raipur27Jodhpur14Patna14Agra13Amritsar11Karnataka10Allahabad7Dehradun7Telangana7SC6Kerala5Varanasi4Rajasthan2Himachal Pradesh1Jabalpur1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 153C85Section 153A39Section 143(3)31Section 6827Section 80P(2)(a)22Addition to Income20Section 36(1)(viia)19Deduction13Section 25012Section 271(1)(c)

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 8/NAG/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Nov 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri C. NareshFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 22Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 80P

56. Further, in other case of CIT v. Nawanshahar Central Co-op Bank Lid. reported in [2012] 349 ITR 689, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also held that "the assessee cooperative society was entitled for deduction under section 80P(2)(a) (i) of Income Tax Act 961, in respect of underwriting commission and interest on PSEB Bonds and IDBI

Showing 1–20 of 80 · Page 1 of 4

12
Disallowance11
Search & Seizure8

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 7/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri C. NareshFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 22Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 80P

56. Further, in other case of CIT v. Nawanshahar Central Co-op Bank Lid. reported in [2012] 349 ITR 689, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also held that "the assessee cooperative society was entitled for deduction under section 80P(2)(a) (i) of Income Tax Act 961, in respect of underwriting commission and interest on PSEB Bonds and IDBI

ECONOMIC EXPLOSIVES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal for the assessment year 2018–19 filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 242/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mani JainFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)

viii) of the Explanation 1 to sub-section (2) of section 115JB of the Act and held that the Assessing Officer has no jurisdiction to make any adjustments other than those specified under Explanation 1 to sub-section (2) of the section 115JB of the Act. For this proposition, the learned CIT(A) relied upon the judgment

ECONOMIC EXPLOSIVES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 (2), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal for the assessment year 2018–19 filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 177/NAG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mani JainFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)

viii) of the Explanation 1 to sub-section (2) of section 115JB of the Act and held that the Assessing Officer has no jurisdiction to make any adjustments other than those specified under Explanation 1 to sub-section (2) of the section 115JB of the Act. For this proposition, the learned CIT(A) relied upon the judgment

ITO, WARD-6(1),, NAGPUR vs. THE VIDARBHA PREMIER CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY,, NAGPUR

In the result these appeals by the assessee and revenue stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 224/NAG/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jan 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi..

For Appellant: Shri Alok Bha gatFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

viii) Considering the activity of the society as one of housing only eligible for deduction of Rs.50,OOO/- only as suggested by you would be unjust and unreasonable besides being an unwarranted departure from the facts already on record and consistently accepted by the Department. All the ingredients of section 80P(2)(a)(i) are fully complied

THE VIDHARBHA PREMIER CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,,NAGPUR vs. TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, RANGE-6, NAGPUR

In the result these appeals by the assessee and revenue stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 232/NAG/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jan 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi..

For Appellant: Shri Alok Bha gatFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

viii) Considering the activity of the society as one of housing only eligible for deduction of Rs.50,OOO/- only as suggested by you would be unjust and unreasonable besides being an unwarranted departure from the facts already on record and consistently accepted by the Department. All the ingredients of section 80P(2)(a)(i) are fully complied

M/S. KABRA ENGINEERING,CHANDRAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 23/NAG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

M/S. CEINSYS TECH LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 43/NAG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

HANSA CITY BUS SERVICES(NAGPUR) P LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 145/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

MALANI COMBINES,AKOLA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AKOLA

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 49/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

JAIKA VEHICLE TRADE PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 103/NAG/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

INTEGRITY CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 32/NAG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

HERD MEDICAL FOUNDATION PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS, WARD-4(2), NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 139/NAG/2021[F.Y.2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

SUDARSHAN MOTORS,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 177/NAG/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

PAWANSUT TRAVELS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 17/NAG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

SHAMLAX METACHEM PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 100/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

STELLAR REFRACTORIES PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 165/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

MAHAVIR COAL WASHIERS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 150/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

SUPRIYA PACKAGING PVT LTD,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 30/NAG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March

M/S. FORMS,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALURU

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 20/NAG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

56. ITA no.146/Nag./2021A.Y. 2019–20 05.10.2021 143(1) 2. At the outset, the Registry has pointed out that the appeals are time barred, the details of which are given above. We also find that assessee has filed a delay condonation application explaining the fact that due to COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown was imposed from 24th March