BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi184Mumbai184Chennai118Bangalore60Kolkata52Ahmedabad43Hyderabad31Pune16Surat13SC9Cochin9Raipur8Visakhapatnam6Karnataka5Indore4Telangana4Dehradun2Kerala2Amritsar2Guwahati2Jaipur2Nagpur2Ranchi2Allahabad1Jabalpur1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)10Section 143(3)2Section 402Addition to Income2

ITO, WARD-1(5), NAGPUR vs. M/S. SHREE GANNAYAK BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 164/NAG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur08 Mar 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. G.D.Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Sh. Mahavir Singhvs Shree Gannayak Builders & Developers, Ito, Ward–1(5), Room No.502, Plot No.2, Near Global India International School, 5Th Floor, Mecl Bldg., Kalmana Basti, Nagpur–440008. Seminary Hills, Pan–Abrfs9402L Nagpur–440006. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. R.K.Baral, Sr.Dr Respondent By Sh. Manoj Moryani, Adv. Date Of Hearing 07.03.2018 Date Of Pronouncement 07.03.2018

Section 143(3)Section 30Section 40A(3)

43A and that the provisions of section 40A(3) were applicable in respect of purchase of goods also. 4. The decision of learned CIT(Appeals) is perverse in aw in as much as the direction to reduce the cost of work in progress by the amount of disallowance

KHALID NADEEM ALLARAKHA,NAGPUR vs. I.T.O. WARD 3(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal is partly allowed

ITA 9/NAG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.K. Bansal & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Manoj MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 43A(3)

disallowing the commission income by assessing, therefore order passed is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive. 4. On the fact and in the circumstances of the case and in law the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Nagpur erred in confirming the addition made at Rs.56,81,006/- by assessing officer applying the provisions of section 40(a)(i), therefore order