SHRI SACHIN M. SATHONE,,NAGPUR vs. ACIT-CIRCLE-6,, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is Partly Allowed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.212/Nag/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Shri Sachin M. Sathone, The Acit, Circle-6, 209, Jai Maa Durga V Nagpur. Apartment, S Kdk Colege Road, Nandanvan, Nagpur – 440009. Pan: Asrps9582N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/Revenue Assessee By Shri Rachit Thakar – Ar Revenue By Shri Rajat Singhal – Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 22/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 08/11/2023 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, Of Ld.Cit(A)-Ii, Nagpur Dated 11.12.2013 For A.Y.2008-09 Emanating From Assessment Order Under Section 143(3) Of The Act, Dated 31.12.2010. The Grounds Of Appeal Filed By The Assessee Are As Under : “1] Learned C.I.T.(A) Erred In Disallowing Salary Etc. Amounting To Rs.4,99,431/- Being 30% Of Total Salary Of Rs. 16,64,770/- On The Shri Sachin M. Sathone [A]

section 133A of Income Tax Act, on 06.09.2010 in the case of Swetha Enterprises, proprietors Sachin Sathone, address: 209, Jai Ma Durga Apartment, Nagpur. Certain documents have been impounded during the survey. The list of said documents is at page 65 of the paper book filed by assessee. In the Assessment Order, the Assessing Officer(AO) has disallowed

SHABBIR AHMED AHMED ALI,NAGPUR vs. NATIONAL E ASSESMENT CENTRY, DELHI

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

disallowance be modified considerably.” 3. The addition made by Assessing Officer is on account of long term capital gain arising from transfer of residential property. 4. Facts in Brief:– In the present case, the assessee is an individual who filed his return of income for the year under consideration electronically on 30/08/2018, declaring total income

M/S. BELLEZZA (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,,NAGPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 2,, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Partly Allowed

Bench: S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.74/Nag/2015 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S.Bellazza (India) Pvt. Ltd., The Acit, Circle-2, Lg-3, Achraj Tower-Ii, Vs Nagpur. Chhaoni Chowk, Chhindwara Road, Nagpur – 13. Pan: Aaccb 4029 M Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri S.C.Thakar – Ar Revenue By Shri G.J.Ninawe - Dr Date Of Hearing 17/11/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 13/01/2023 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Nagpur Dated 05.11.2014 Emanating From The Order Of Acit(Ao) Dated 30.12.2011 Passed Under Section 143(3) Of The Act,1961. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1] A.C.I.T. Erred In Rejecting The Audited Books Of Account & Estimated Income @ 5% Of Total Receipts & Also Adding Additional Income Of Rs.30 Lacs To The Returned Income. Learned C.I.T.(A) Has Confirm The Addition Without Any Basis. 2] Learned C.I.T.(A) & A.C.I.T. Erred In Not Accepting The Assessee’S Various Submission & Supporting Documents Filed By The

section 133A of the Act at various premises of the assessee company during the F.Y. 2008-09 on 25/02/2009. During assessment proceedings , the Assessing Officer(AO) has rejected the books of accounts of the assessee and estimated the net profit at 5% and accordingly determined the total income at Rs.85,30,209/- as under: i) Estimated net profit : Rs.55

I.T.O. WARD -1, AMRAVATI vs. SHRI SANJAY NANASAHEB BHARSAKALE, AMRAVATI

In the result, the appeal of the department is rejected

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

209 to 233 of the paper book. It is seen that all the transactions made with such persons were duly reflected in the books of account of appellant. It is also the grievance of the appellant that all the statements were recorded behind the back of the appellant and no opportunity to cross examine was granted to the appellant

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL FINANCE INDIA P. LTD.,, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue's appeal being ITA no

disallowance of interest paid.\n11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned\nCIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.31,20,000/- made on account\nof investment in land treated as unexplained.\n12. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned\nCIT

A,C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.- 2(2), NAGPUR vs. SHRI DHARAMPAL R.AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue's appeal being ITA no

disallowance of interest paid.\n11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned\nCIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.31,20,000/- made on account\nof investment in land treated as unexplained.\n12. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned\nCIT

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL FINANCE INDIA P. LTD.,, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue's appeal being ITA no

disallowance of interest paid.\n11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned\nCIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.31,20,000/- made on account\nof investment in land treated as unexplained.\n12. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned\nCIT

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL COAL INDIA PVT. LTD.,, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal being ITA no

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

disallowance of interest paid. 11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.31,20,000/- made on account of investment in land treated as unexplained. 12. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned

A,C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.- 2(2), NAGPUR vs. SHRI DHARAMPAL R.AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal being ITA no

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

disallowance of interest paid. 11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.31,20,000/- made on account of investment in land treated as unexplained. 12. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR vs. M/S NANDLAL ENTERPRISES, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

section 40(a)(ia) r.w.s. 194C of the Act. 4. On the other hand, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee made payments to M/s. Ramkrishna Transport Company, who in turn, disbursed the amount among the truck owners for the services rendered by truck owners to the assessee. However, there is no finding of fact

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR vs. M/S NANDLAL ENTERPRISES, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

section 40(a)(ia) r.w.s. 194C of the Act. 4. On the other hand, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee made payments to M/s. Ramkrishna Transport Company, who in turn, disbursed the amount among the truck owners for the services rendered by truck owners to the assessee. However, there is no finding of fact

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR vs. M/S NANDLAL ENTERPRISES, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

section 40(a)(ia) r.w.s. 194C of the Act. 4. On the other hand, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee made payments to M/s. Ramkrishna Transport Company, who in turn, disbursed the amount among the truck owners for the services rendered by truck owners to the assessee. However, there is no finding of fact