KRUSHI VIBHAG KARMCHARI VRUND SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA MARYADIT ,WARDHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD-1, NAGPUR
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 182/NAG/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur06 Oct 2022AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri R.S. Syalनिर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Krushi Vibhag Karmchari Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Vrund Sahakari Pat Sanstha Wardha Maryadit Bajaj Building, Krushna Nagar, Wardha, Maharashtra – 442001 Pan: Aacak6196N Appellant Respondent
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 144Section 148Section 80Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80P
depreciation, but the timing of filing the Form was a directory requirement, which was fulfilled on filing it even during the course of assessment proceedings. The
9
Krushi Vibhag Karmchari Vrund
Sah Pat Sanstha Maryadit
Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Shivanand Electronics (supra) dealt with the requirement of filing audit report for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 80J