SAHEBRAO R. PATIL,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3), NAGPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 405/NAG/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Mar 2019AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.405/Nag/2013 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009–10 Smt. Saroj Sahebrao Patil, L/H Of Late Shri Sahebrao R. Patil, Tikekar Road, Dhantoli, Nagpur. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Acrpp0905C बनाम / V/S. Ito, Ward–1(3), ……""यथ" / Respondent Nagpur. Assessee By : Shri C. J. Thakar, Adv. Revenue By : Shri U. U. Kasar, Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 26.03.2019 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 28.03.2019 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-I, Nagpur Dated 21.08.2013 For The Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under :–
For Appellant: Shri C. J. Thakar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri U. U. Kasar, DR
Section 143(3)Section 50C
2]
The learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts by preferring the value done by DVO over the valuation certificate from Dy. Register of stamps , Nagpur submitted by the appellant.
3]
The learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts by ignoring the fact that the possession of the appellant on the property sold was sub- judiced