ECONOMIC EXPLOSIVES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 (2), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal for the assessment year 2018–19 filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

depreciation as is adopted while preparing its accounts that are laid before the company at its annual general meeting in accordance with provisions of Sec.210 of the Companies Act. Explanation below sec.115JB of the Act provides that for the purposes of section 115JB of the Act, "book profit" means the net profit as shown in the profit and loss account

ECONOMIC EXPLOSIVES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal for the assessment year 2018–19 filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

depreciation as is adopted while preparing its accounts that are laid before the company at its annual general meeting in accordance with provisions of Sec.210 of the Companies Act. Explanation below sec.115JB of the Act provides that for the purposes of section 115JB of the Act, "book profit" means the net profit as shown in the profit and loss account

ASSTT.C,I,.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(3), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA COALFIELDS & WASHERIES LTD., NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA COAL(INDIA) LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA GLOBAL RESOURCES LTD(EAELIER KNOWN AS GUPTA COALFIELDS & WASHHERIES LTD), NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA COAL(INDIA) LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA GLOBAL RESOURCES LTD(EAELIER KNOWN AS GUPTA COALFIELDS & WASHHERIES LTD), NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA COAL(INDIA) LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA COAL(INDIA) LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA GLOBAL RESOURCES LTD(EAELIER KNOWN AS GUPTA COALFIELDS & WASHHERIES LTD), NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA COAL(INDIA) LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIR 2(3) R, NAGPUR vs. M GUPTA COALFIELDS & WASHERIES LTD., NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

ASSTT. C.I.T, CENTRAL CIR, -2(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S GUPTA GLOBAL RESOURCES LTD(EAELIER KNOWN AS GUPTA COALFIELDS 7 WASHHERIES LTD), NAGPUR

In the result, cross objections No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

36 Group of 22 Cases, Nagpur. Gupta group of cases. 97. Ground No.4 raised in this appeal pertains to the addition of Rs.4,19,64,686/- towards undisclosed income. 98. The brief facts on the issue are that the Statement of Padmesh Gupta, Director of the appellant company was recorded on 28-8-2009 in the search proceedings

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL COAL INDIA PVT. LTD.,, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal being ITA no

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

36,654/-. 7. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of depreciation of Rs. 47,53,025/-. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of unsecured loans being unexplained

A,C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.- 2(2), NAGPUR vs. SHRI DHARAMPAL R.AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal being ITA no

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

36,654/-. 7. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of depreciation of Rs. 47,53,025/-. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of unsecured loans being unexplained

A,C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.- 2(2), NAGPUR vs. SHRI DHARAMPAL R.AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

36,654/-. 7. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of depreciation of Rs. 47,53,025/-. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of unsecured loans being unexplained

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL FINANCE INDIA P. LTD.,, NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

36,654/-. 7. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of depreciation of Rs. 47,53,025/-. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of unsecured loans being unexplained

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL FINANCE INDIA P. LTD.,, NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

36,654/-. 7. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of depreciation of Rs. 47,53,025/-. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of unsecured loans being unexplained

ACIT ,CIRCLE (EXEMPTION ),NAGPUR , NAGPUR vs. M/S SIPNA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ,AMRAVAI , AMRAVATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2013-14 The Acit, Vs. M/S. Sipnashikshan Prasarak Mandal Circle (Exemption), Badnera Road Amravati Amravati Pan No.:Aacts 1266 J Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shripiyushkolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shrihimeshdemble (Ca) Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28/06/2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Department Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit (A)-4, Nagpur Dated 27/03/2017 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y. 2013-14 Wherein The Department Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.

vi) or any hospital or other institution referred to in sub clause (iiiae) or sub clause (via) or any fund or institution referred to in sub-clause ('iv) or any trust or institution referred to in sub-clause (v) of clause (23G) of section JO or any trust or intuition referred to in section ii, includes any income