BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai418Delhi312Bangalore123Chennai105Kolkata56Jaipur52Raipur36Hyderabad29Ahmedabad23Lucknow14Pune13Cochin12Chandigarh10Cuttack9Kerala8Indore7Karnataka6Panaji5Ranchi5Surat3Amritsar3Nagpur3Rajkot3SC3Dehradun2Telangana1Calcutta1Rajasthan1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 1545Section 683Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2Section 142(1)2

ACIT ,CIRCLE (EXEMPTION ),NAGPUR , NAGPUR vs. M/S SIPNA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ,AMRAVAI , AMRAVATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed

ITA 223/NAG/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2013-14 The Acit, Vs. M/S. Sipnashikshan Prasarak Mandal Circle (Exemption), Badnera Road Amravati Amravati Pan No.:Aacts 1266 J Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shripiyushkolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shrihimeshdemble (Ca) Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28/06/2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Department Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit (A)-4, Nagpur Dated 27/03/2017 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y. 2013-14 Wherein The Department Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.

For Appellant: ShriHimeshDemble (CA)For Respondent: ShriPiyushKolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

2. (2014) M/s. Vaishnavi Educational Society vs DCIT in ITA No. 1179 to 1181/Hyd/2014[Pg. No. 220 to 230] (Vol - II); 3. (2014) M/s. Sahyog Jan KalyanSamiti vs. DIT in ITA No. 607&608/Lkw/2013[Pg. No. 231 to 238] (Vol - II); 4. (2012) M/s. GuganSolanki Memorial Educational Society vsADIT

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-1(3), NAGPUR vs. M/S SPACEWOOD FURNISHERS PVT. LTD , NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 163/NAG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur11 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)Section 154

220 Taxman 171) (Mad HC) ITO v. Volkart Brothers (82 ITR 50) (SC). 4. CIT v. R. K. Shrivastav (HUF) (298 ITR 53) (Delhi HC). 5.7 Considering the facts and circumstances and judicial precedents cited, the appellant deserves to succeed as the disallowance of prior-period expenses of Rs.17,65,162/- cannot be subject matter of rectification under section

RAVINDRA MADANLAL KHANDELWAL,AKOLA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE , AKOLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 375/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 144BSection 68

220 30,222 Ku. Shruti Ravi 19,470 1,947 14 Khandelwal 15 Ku. Vijeta A Agrawal 30,000 3,000 16 Murlidhar R Chandak 30,417 3,042 17 Namita N Khandelwal 81,812 8,181 18 Nitin M Khandelwal 3,577,401 357,740 19 Omprakash M Sharma 132,000 13,200 20 Prabla Manoj Shah