BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

155 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 30clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,255Chennai1,158Delhi1,051Kolkata651Bangalore491Ahmedabad436Pune393Hyderabad391Jaipur353Patna231Chandigarh190Karnataka185Nagpur155Surat152Lucknow137Indore130Raipur123Amritsar122Rajkot108Visakhapatnam106Cuttack71Cochin62Agra53Panaji50Calcutta49SC41Dehradun31Guwahati30Jodhpur27Allahabad24Varanasi22Jabalpur21Telangana21Kerala5Orissa5Rajasthan5Himachal Pradesh3Ranchi3Andhra Pradesh3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 194A56Section 200A48Section 25045TDS45Condonation of Delay44Deduction43Section 20140Limitation/Time-bar33Exemption

ASTAVINAYAK GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,JANEPHAL vs. ITO WARD-1, KHAMGAON

In the result, as delay in filing of appeal is not condoned, the appeal is not admitted and is rejected accordingly

ITA 158/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Nilesh ToshniwalFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha
Section 147Section 148Section 2(31)Section 249Section 249(2)

condone the delay. The learned CIT(A) has elaborately dealt with the issue, the observations of the learned CIT(A) are as under:– “4. Observations &Findings: - As mentioned above, the appeal against the order under section 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s. 1448 dated 30

Showing 1–20 of 155 · Page 1 of 8

...
31
Section 201(1)28
Section 153C21
Section 26317

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, EXEMPTION, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 129/NAG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Vikash Agrawal
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 271(1)(c)

30 days, the delay thereafter cannot be condoned without there being compelling grounds as advocated by the Hon'ble Courts. 21,0. From the facts of the case, it is clear that the statutory right to appeal which was vested with the appellant was not exercised within the stipulated time u/s.249(2). Thus, this clearly is a case of laches

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WD 3, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 128/NAG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Vikash Agrawal
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 271(1)(c)

30 days, the delay thereafter cannot be condoned without there being compelling grounds as advocated by the Hon'ble Courts. 21,0. From the facts of the case, it is clear that the statutory right to appeal which was vested with the appellant was not exercised within the stipulated time u/s.249(2). Thus, this clearly is a case of laches

CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,NAGPUR,NAGPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), CIT (E), INCOME TAX OFFICE, PMT BUILDING, SHANKAR SETH ROAD, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assesee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 347/NAG/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur08 Jul 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Naresh Jakhotia, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Benjwal, CIT.Dr
Section 80GSection 80G(5)

delayed submission. He desires that the same may be condoned and the matter may be set aside to CIT (Exemption) to take a fresh look in this regard. On the other hand, Ld. CIT DR submitted that the rejection has been correctly done by the CIT (Exemption) and the order need not be interfered with. 5. We have heard

POLICE KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA GONDIA,GONDIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2, GONDIA

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 263/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)

30 days may kindly be condoned in order to render the justice.” 4. There is sufficient and reasonable cause for condoning the delay, accordingly we do so. 5. Before us, Shri Abhay Agrawal, Counsel appearing for the assessee invited our attention to the relevant portion of the impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A) which is reproduced below

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTIES LTD.,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 151/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTIES LTD.,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 150/NAG/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTIES LTD.,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 152/NAG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 306/NAG/2023[2013-14 (FY 20012-13, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 284/NAG/2023[2008-09 (FY 2007-08, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 307/NAG/2023[2014-15 (FY 2013-14, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 308/NAG/2023[2016-17 (FY 2015-16, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 314/NAG/2023[2013-14 (FY 2012-13, Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 315/NAG/2023[2013-14 (FY 2012-13, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTIES LTD.,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 153/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 317/NAG/2023[2014-15 (FY 2013-14, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BAJAJ STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 316/NAG/2023[2014-15 (FY2013-14, Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 250

30 days Page 3 of 10 Bajaj Steel Industries Limited (13 appeals) [A] ITA.Nos.150 to 154, 284, 306 to 308, 314 to 317/NAG./2023 from the date of receipt of the impugned order under section 200A of the Act. However, assessee had filed appeal on 08.09.2021. Therefore, the ld.CIT(A) observed that assessee has filed appeal with delay

BANK OF INDIA,MAHAL BRANCH NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 160/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

30 days of received of order. Moreover, the concerned at the branch was transferred shortly after which led to oblivion towards the matter. Since then due to continuous changes of branch managers and no centralized handling of each individual branch orders, unintentionally branches have failed to comply with same. Also due to corona virus pandemic in last 2 years

BANK OF INDIA, DONGARGAON NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 153/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

30 days of received of order. Moreover, the concerned at the branch was transferred shortly after which led to oblivion towards the matter. Since then due to continuous changes of branch managers and no centralized handling of each individual branch orders, unintentionally branches have failed to comply with same. Also due to corona virus pandemic in last 2 years

VINAY RAMSHARANDAS AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 110/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(3)Section 263

condone the delay and admit the same for adjudication on merits. 6. Insofar as the merits of the case are concerned, the facts are, the assessee is an Individual. For the year under consideration, on 31/01/2018, the assessee filed his return of income electronically, disclosing total income of ` 12,96,33,940. During the course of regular assessment framed under