BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 282(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Amritsar69Mumbai62Jaipur52Delhi48Chennai46Pune46Panaji39Bangalore31Chandigarh29Kolkata29Hyderabad25Ahmedabad22Cochin14Indore13Lucknow10Rajkot10Raipur7Agra6Nagpur6Visakhapatnam6Jodhpur4Cuttack4Surat3SC2Allahabad2Patna2Varanasi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 80P10Section 80P(2)(a)8Section 2638Section 143(3)7Deduction4Condonation of Delay4Addition to Income4Section 80P(2)(c)2Section 56

VAISHALI KAKDE,MANISH NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 4(5), CIVIL LINES

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in limine

ITA 384/NAG/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jan 2025AY 2017-2018
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 253

1) The Assessee;\n(2) The Revenue;\n(3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial);\n(4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and\n(5) Guard file.\nTrue Copy\nBy Order\nPradeep J. Chowdhury\nSr. Private Secretary\nSr. Private Secretary\nITAT, Nagpur", "summary": { "facts": "The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) with a delay of 282 days

GAJANAND FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 126/NAG/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur
2
Section 234A2
Section 682
22 Sept 2025
AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

condone the delay of 267 days in filing the present appeal and admit the same for adjudication on merit, as no mala fide intention can be ascribed to the assessee. 5. Facts in Brief:– The assessee is a Company engaged in financial activities. The assessee, on 30/09/2013, filed its return of income for the year under consideration declaring total loss

POLICE KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA GONDIA,GONDIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2, GONDIA

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 263/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)

condoning the delay, accordingly we do so. 5. Before us, Shri Abhay Agrawal, Counsel appearing for the assessee invited our attention to the relevant portion of the impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A) which is reproduced below for ready reference:– “5.2. APPELLANT'S SUBMISSION: The appellant did not make any specific submission in this regard. However, he filed

THE ISMAILIA URBAN CO-OP SOCIETY LTD.,YAVATMAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1

ITA 122/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Naresh Jakhotia, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 70PSection 8Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed for adjudication. 6. Before us, the appellant has submitted the detailed submissions contained in page 6 to 21 of paper book, which are reproduced below for clear understanding of the gamut of the dispute. 6.1 With above short summary of the case, Appellant would humbly like to submit the following for your kind consideration : Sr.No

M/S. NEERI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 293/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Ms. Shrishti PandeFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(2)Section 250Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

delay of 142 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned. We now proceed to dispose off the appeal on merit. 5. Brief facts of the case are, the assessee is an Employee’s Co–operative Credit Society for the employees working at National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI). For the year under consideration, the assessee Society filed

AMRAVATI JILHA VIMA KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, AMRAVATI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 81/NAG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Shri Bhavesh MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

condonation of delay and decided appeal on merits, therefore order passed is illegal, invalid and bad in law; 4. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) erred in confirming the addition of Rs.12,25,000/- as interest income on investments of Rs.1,75,00,000/- though the same were not received during the previous year