BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka101Mumbai99Chennai68Delhi59Bangalore58Kolkata46Jaipur29Cuttack27Lucknow17Hyderabad17Pune12Ahmedabad10Amritsar10Indore8Varanasi8Raipur8Chandigarh8Nagpur7Surat7Allahabad6Calcutta5Guwahati5Patna2SC2Cochin1Rajasthan1Visakhapatnam1Jodhpur1Telangana1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)15Section 194A10Section 271D7Section 2505Deduction5TDS5Limitation/Time-bar5Section 269S4Section 2713

ASTAVINAYAK GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,JANEPHAL vs. ITO WARD-1, KHAMGAON

In the result, as delay in filing of appeal is not condoned, the appeal is not admitted and is rejected accordingly

ITA 158/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Nilesh ToshniwalFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha
Section 147Section 148Section 2(31)Section 249Section 249(2)

section (3) empowers the CIT(A) to admit an appeal after the expiry of the said period if he is satisfied that the appellant had sufficient cause for not presenting the appeal within the period. As discussed in the preceding para, the present appellant has not been able to show any reasonable cause for filing the appeal late

Section 2693
Section 1483
Condonation of Delay2

ASHA VINOD TATTE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMRAVATI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5/NAG/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Oct 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 139Section 2(14)Section 269Section 269SSection 271Section 271DSection 273B

condonation of delay is thus unjustified and unwarranted. 4. Order imposing penalty u/s 271D of I.T. Act 1961 is illegal, invalid and bad in law in the absence of any satisfaction in the assessment proceedings in the case of assessee. 5. In levy of penalty u/s 271D on amount of Rs.6,51,000/- includes Rs.6,00,000/- paid by cheque

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 272/NAG/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 271/NAG/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 269/NAG/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONE OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 337/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction

BANK OF INDIA ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 270/NAG/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction