HIVTAP NIRMULAN KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,YAVATMAL vs. ITO WARD-1 , YAVATMAL
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 571/NAG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur17 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalehivtap Nirmulan Karmachari, Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit T.B. Karyalayapandharkawada Road, ……………. Appellant Yavatmal -445 001, Maharashtra. Pan–Aabah6751K V/S Income Tax Officer, ……………. Respondent Ward–1, Yavatmal-445001, Maharashtra. Assessee By: Shri.Naresh Jakhotia.A.R. Revenue By :Shri.Surjit Kumar Saha.Sr.Dr
For Appellant: Shri.Naresh Jakhotia.A.RFor Respondent: Shri.Surjit Kumar Saha.Sr.DR
Section 249(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)
condoning the delay in filing the appeal, ignoring that the delay occurred due to reasonable and bona fide reasons beyond the control of the appellant.
2 That the Learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the reasons furnished for the delay constituted "sufficient cause" within the meaning of section 249