SANJAY MOTIRAMJI MULEY,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD (4)(3), NAGPUR
In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 4/NAG/2025[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur07 Oct 2025AY 2008-09
Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalesanjay Motiramji Muley, Ward No.7, Mahajan Pura ……………. Appellant Bhandara Road, Pardi Nagpur 440008. Pan – Akdpm6463G V/S Income Tax Officer ……………. Respondent Ward–4(4), Nagpur Assessee By : Ms. Alfiya Rozie.Ar Revenue By :Shri Surjit Kumar Saha.Sr.Dr
For Appellant: Ms. Alfiya Rozie.ARFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha.Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 50C
244 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal.
The learned Authorised Representative for the assessee (for short "the
2
Sanjay Motiramji Muley
ITA no.4/Nag./2025
learned A.R.") referred to the Affidavit filed by the assessee explaining the reasonable cause where the assessee is not aware of the legal provisions of the Act and the delay is not deliberate
