Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 226(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 206C8 Section 12A6 TDS4 Survey u/s 133A4 Section 12A(1)(ac)2 Section 80G(5)2 Charitable Trust2 Exemption2 Natural Justice

VIJAY ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WD,-8(4), NAGPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 101/NAG/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Feb 2020AY 2003-04

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgarwalFor Respondent: Shri Milind Bhusari

Section 143(3)Section 201(1)Section 271C

3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). The moot point is as to whether such a long delay deserves condonation. At this stage, it is relevant to note the judgment of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Vijay Vishin Meghani Vs. DCIT & Anr (2017) 398 ITR 250 (Bom) holding that none should

BULDANA URBAN CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION(JV),BULDHANA vs. I.T.O. (TDS)1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

VIJAY ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WD,-8(4), NAGPUR

BULDANA URBAN CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION(JV),BULDHANA vs. I.T.O. (TDS)1(2), AKOLA

VIJAY ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WD,-8(4), NAGPUR

BULDANA URBAN CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION(JV),BULDHANA vs. I.T.O. (TDS)1(2), AKOLA

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRAUCTION (J.V). ,BULDHANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (J.V),BULDANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (J.V),BULDANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

HASAMSETH PABLIK LAYBRARI AND CHERITEBAL TRUST,AKOLA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

HASAMSETH PABLIK LAYBRARI AND CHERITEBAL TRUST,AKOLA vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PUNE