BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune199Delhi149Bangalore117Chennai80Raipur39Mumbai25Karnataka22Kolkata18Nagpur16Ahmedabad16Lucknow14Cochin13Jodhpur12Panaji10Rajkot9Dehradun8Jaipur7Hyderabad6Cuttack6Chandigarh6Amritsar4Indore3Varanasi2

Key Topics

Section 234E41TDS16Section 206C8Section 200A4Survey u/s 133A4

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRAUCTION (J.V). ,BULDHANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 164/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur13 Jul 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon’Ble

Section 206C

section 206C(7) of the Act with regard to charging of interest was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 and was thus not applicable to any years prior to that. 8. The AOP and its members are not separate entities, therefore no TCS was required to be collected from its member. Even, in the remand report, learned CIT(A) has admitted

BULDANA URBAN CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION(JV),BULDHANA vs. I.T.O. (TDS)1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 176/NAG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur13 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon’Ble

Section 206C

section 206C(7) of the Act with regard to charging of interest was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 and was thus not applicable to any years prior to that. 8. The AOP and its members are not separate entities, therefore no TCS was required to be collected from its member. Even, in the remand report, learned CIT(A) has admitted

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (J.V),BULDANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 166/NAG/2018[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur11 Jul 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon’Ble

Section 206C

section 206C(7) of the Act with regard to charging of interest was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 and was thus not applicable to any years prior to that. 8. The AOP and its members are not separate entities, therefore no TCS was required to be collected from its member. Even, in the remand report, learned CIT(A) has admitted

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (J.V),BULDANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 165/NAG/2018[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur11 Jul 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon’Ble

Section 206C

section 206C(7) of the Act with regard to charging of interest was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 and was thus not applicable to any years prior to that. 8. The AOP and its members are not separate entities, therefore no TCS was required to be collected from its member. Even, in the remand report, learned CIT(A) has admitted

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 213/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S RAJYAS SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 208/NAG/2019[214-15 (Q-4(26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 215/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q-4 - 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 210/NAG/2019[2013-14 Q3-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 209/NAG/2019[2013-14-Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 216/NAG/2019[2015-16 Q1-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 214/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q-3-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 211/NAG/2019[2013-14 Q4-(26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 217/NAG/2019[2015-16 Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 212/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q1-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeals on merits. B. Merits of the Issue 3. In this set of appeals, the intimation had been issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) wherein, the late filing fees payable u/s 234E of the Act was charged

HASANTE BURHANIAH FIDAYYIAH TRUST,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals for A

ITA 9/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe, CIT–DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

condone the delay in filing the present appeals and proceed to dispose off the appeals on merits. 5. Since both the aforesaid appeals relate to the same assessee involving only common issue, except variation in figures, which arose out of identical set of facts and circumstances, therefore, as a matter of convenience, these appeals were heard together and are being

SHEPHALI ANIL MALVIYA,NAGPUR vs. DCIT,CPC,TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeals (Ms

ITA 115/NAG/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe, CIT–DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government account and after doing that he has to furnish the TDS statement before the Income Tax Authorities within the prescribed time limit. If there is late filing of those TDS statements then the Revenue Authorities may charge late filing