BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

84 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 192clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai231Delhi227Kolkata153Mumbai132Karnataka127Nagpur84Pune80Bangalore75Ahmedabad72Visakhapatnam57Hyderabad57Jaipur54Amritsar49Chandigarh45Calcutta37Cochin24Lucknow20Indore17Patna15Cuttack11Surat10Agra10Jodhpur10Raipur8Varanasi6Allahabad5Guwahati5Rajkot5Ranchi5SC4Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)50Section 234E37Section 20133TDS31Section 194A30Deduction19Limitation/Time-bar17Condonation of Delay17Section 250

GAJANAND FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 126/NAG/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

condone the delay of 267 days in filing the present appeal and admit the same for adjudication on merit, as no mala fide intention can be ascribed to the assessee. 5. Facts in Brief:– The assessee is a Company engaged in financial activities. The assessee, on 30/09/2013, filed its return of income for the year under consideration declaring total loss

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

Showing 1–20 of 84 · Page 1 of 5

16
Section 200A10
Section 2638
Section 80P(2)(d)7

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 211/NAG/2019[2013-14 Q4-(26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 213/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 216/NAG/2019[2015-16 Q1-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 212/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q1-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 215/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q-4 - 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 217/NAG/2019[2015-16 Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S RAJYAS SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 208/NAG/2019[214-15 (Q-4(26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 210/NAG/2019[2013-14 Q3-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 214/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q-3-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 209/NAG/2019[2013-14-Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

192, Central Avenue Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q Road, Wardhaman 2014-15 Q1 26Q Nagar, 2014-15 Q2 26Q Nagpur – 440008 2014-15 Q3 26Q 2014-15 Q4 26Q PAN: AACFP0324Q 2015-16 Q1 26Q 2015-16 Q2 26Q 2015-16 Q3 26Q 27-28 246/NAG/2019 M/s. Minor Irrigation ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q And (ZP) Sub Division

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 277/NAG/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryassessment Year : 2012-13 Bank Of India, Dcit (Tds), Hingna Branch, Nagpur Zonal Office, Vs. Circle-1, 3Rd Floor, Csd Dept., Kingsways, Nagpur Nagpur – 440 001, Maharashtra Pan : Aaacb0472C Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 201(3)(i)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is that the order passed by the AO was time barred in view of the provisions contained in section

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 392/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is 6 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 that the order passed by the AO was time barred

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 362/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is 6 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 that the order passed by the AO was time barred

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRICLE-51(10, NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 388/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is 6 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 that the order passed by the AO was time barred

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 387/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is 6 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 that the order passed by the AO was time barred

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 366/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is 6 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 that the order passed by the AO was time barred

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 361/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is 6 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 that the order passed by the AO was time barred

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 386/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is 6 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 that the order passed by the AO was time barred

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 363/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condone the delay in presenting the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue raised in this appeal is about the limitation for passing of the order u/s 201(1)/(1A). The claim of the assessee is 6 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 that the order passed by the AO was time barred