BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 138clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka104Mumbai102Chennai92Bangalore84Delhi82Ahmedabad73Pune65Kolkata51Calcutta36Hyderabad27Jaipur24Indore19Chandigarh18Kerala17Surat13Visakhapatnam10Lucknow10Rajkot8Cochin7Raipur7Cuttack5Nagpur5Patna5Allahabad3SC3Amritsar3Andhra Pradesh2Jodhpur1Orissa1Rajasthan1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 54B12Section 2637Section 1476Section 143(3)4Exemption3Section 1482Section 143(1)2Condonation of Delay2Capital Gains

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) - 4, NAGPUR vs. DEENDAYAL SEVA PRATISHTHAN, YAVATMAL

In the result, appeal by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 572/NAG/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 11Section 12Section 138

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay

ANITA SNEHADEEP SONI,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 4(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

2
Deduction2
Reassessment2
Reopening of Assessment2
ITA 274/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur12 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Smt. Veena AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 147Section 69A

138 days in filing the present appeal before the Tribunal. While going through the record available before us, we find that the assessee has filed a letter dated 30/11/2024, requesting the Bench for condoning the delay in filing the present appeal. The reason for the delay in filing the appeal, as contained in the letter dated 30/11/2024, are as under

VINAY RAMSHARANDAS AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 110/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(3)Section 263

condone the delay and admit the same for adjudication on merits. 6. Insofar as the merits of the case are concerned, the facts are, the assessee is an Individual. For the year under consideration, on 31/01/2018, the assessee filed his return of income electronically, disclosing total income of ` 12,96,33,940. During the course of regular assessment framed under

SHRI PRABODH SADASHIV SADAVARTE (HUF), NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(4),, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 377/NAG/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Aug 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Saket BhattadFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 54B

138, Ramnagar, Nagpur PAN : AAHHP0169E .......अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/s. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1(4), Nagpur ……प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Saket Bhattad Revenue by : Smt. Rashmi Mathur सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 18-07-2023 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 03-08-2023 A.Y. 2006-07 आदेश / ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM : These cross appeals

PRABODH SADASHIV SADAVARTEM(HUF),NAGPUR vs. I.T.O.(TDS) WARD -1(4), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 547/NAG/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Aug 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Saket BhattadFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 54B

138, Ramnagar, Nagpur PAN : AAHHP0169E .......अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/s. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1(4), Nagpur ……प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Saket Bhattad Revenue by : Smt. Rashmi Mathur सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 18-07-2023 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 03-08-2023 A.Y. 2006-07 आदेश / ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM : These cross appeals