Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 133(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115B11 Section 1484 Penalty4 Natural Justice4 Exemption3 Addition to Income3 Section 133(6)2 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 1192

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, EXEMPTION, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 129/NAG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Vikash Agrawal

Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 271(1)(c)

133(6) of the Act was also communicated to the assessee the the reason, as sought by the Assessing Officer, as to why the aforesaid donation should not be treated as anonymous donation under section 115BBC of the Act. 4. The Assessing Officer concluded that the assessee failed to establish genuineness of donation received of an amount

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, EXEMPTION, NAGPUR

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WD 3, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, EXEMPTION, NAGPUR

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WD 3, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

ANANT RAMRAO CHAVAN,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMRAVATI

ARPITA MATHEW ARUKAKKAL,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 5(3), NAGPUR

ABID MUSTAFA KHAN,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD-2(3), NAGPUR

MADHUR LAXMAN GADIKAR,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 4(1), NAGPUR

CYTEC INDIA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS & MATERIALS PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, NAGPUR