BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi211Chennai106Mumbai79Bangalore76Hyderabad64Jaipur46Pune26Ahmedabad13Chandigarh12Kolkata10Amritsar8Nagpur5Patna4Agra4Surat4Lucknow4Raipur3Dehradun2Allahabad2Guwahati2Telangana1Andhra Pradesh1Cuttack1Indore1Karnataka1Rajkot1SC1

Key Topics

Section 1125Section 12A6Addition to Income5Section 1324Section 143(3)4Exemption4Section 13(1)(c)3Section 13(3)3Section 69A3

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 336/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

charitable or religious trust which forfeits 8 exemptions by virtue of the provisions of the IT Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c) and (d) of that Act, the said rate will not apply to the business profits of such trusts which

Section 133A3
Survey u/s 133A3
Undisclosed Income3

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2 (1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 337/NAG/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Apr 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

charitable or religious trust which forfeits 8 exemptions by virtue of the provisions of the IT Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c) and (d) of that Act, the said rate will not apply to the business profits of such trusts which

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 335/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

charitable or religious trust which forfeits 8 exemptions by virtue of the provisions of the IT Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c) and (d) of that Act, the said rate will not apply to the business profits of such trusts which

SHRI VASANTRAO GOPALRAO GHONGE,WARDHA vs. DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR. 1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 37/NAG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2011-12 Late Vasantrao Gopalrao Ghonge Vs. The Dcit Thru Legal Heir Vilas Vasantrao Ghonge Central Circle 1 (1) Gharpure Layout, Nagri Bank Colony, Nagpur Warda Pan No.:Aiwpg 6212 C Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shri K.P. Dewani, Adv Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Appellant Against Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Nagpur Dated 21/12/2015 In Appeal Nos. Cit(A)-3/242/2013-14 For Asstt. Year 2011-12. Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Appellant For Asstt. Year 2011-12 Are As Under:- “A) The Learned A.O. Was Wrong & Unjustified In Making An Addition Of Samarpan Nidhi Of Rs.20,79,936/- To The Total Income Of The Undersigned Assessee As Net Business / Vocational Income. B) The Learned A.O. Was Wrong Arbitrary & Unjustified In Making An Addition Of Receipts Of B.S.Y. Vasantrao Gopalrao Ghonge Maharaj Nyas Of Rs.5,21,349/- To The Total Income Of The Undersigned Assessee On The Presumption That Those Receipts Belong To The Undersigned.

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 11Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

charitable institution eligible for benefit of its income being exempt u/s 11 of I.T. Act 1961. Considering totality of facts and circumstances, addition made by A.O. in respect to income of trust is therefore directed to be deleted. Such income is directed be considered at the hands of trust. Grounds (b) of appeal of appellant is allowed. 15. In Ground

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR vs. SHRI VINOD BALBHADRA GOENKA,, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 204/NAG/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Acit Vs. Shri Vinod Balbhadra Goenka Circle-4 247, Nandanvan Layout Nagpur Nagpur Pan No.:Aanpg 6841 N Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shri K.P. Dewani, Adv Date Of Hearing: 28/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal By Revenue Against Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Nagpur Dated 30/03/2017 In Appeal No.Cit(A)- 4/198/16-17 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Grounds Raised By The Revenue In This Appeal Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 10(38)Section 131Section 68Section 69C

Trust, had shown certain income by way of voluntary contributions. The CIT concerned passed an order u/s 263 of the IT Act, 1961 holding that the assessee is liable to be assessed on that sum as income from other sources. The said income was determined by CIT as unexplained cash credit u/s 68. The assessee approached the Hon’ble ITAT