BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 92clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka452Mumbai274Delhi234Chennai107Bangalore105Jaipur74Ahmedabad69Chandigarh53Pune45Cochin39Kolkata28Visakhapatnam27Hyderabad24Calcutta16Allahabad16Lucknow16Surat12Amritsar11Indore11Telangana8Cuttack7Agra7Nagpur3Patna3Rajasthan3Rajkot3SC2Jodhpur2Ranchi1Raipur1Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271B4Section 2(15)3Section 273B2Section 2632Section 112Exemption2

VASUNDHARA BAHUUDESHIYA SAMAJIKK SANSTHA,KHAMGAON vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), NAGPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 55/NAG/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2015-16 Vasundhara Bahuudeshiya Vs. C.I.T.(Exemptions) Samajik Sanstha, Pune At Nagpur. 1, Vasundhara, Madhav Nagar, Khamgaon-444303. Pan No.: Aaabv 0305 P Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri Mahavir Atal (Ca) Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing: 27/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28/06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. C.I.T.(Exemptions), Pune At Nagpur Dated 23/03/2021 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) For The A.Y. 2015-16 Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Raised By The Assesee. “1. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit By Taking A Recourse To Section 263 Is Illegal & Bad In Law, When The A.O. Has Made Sufficient Enquiries During The Assessment Procedure. 2. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit, Without Considering Appellant’S Submission Is Illegal & Bad In Law. 3. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit Even Though If It Is Termed As Erroneous But It Is Not Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue. As The Donation Has Been Duly Disclosed By The Appellant In Their

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Atal (CA)For Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 253(5)Section 263

Charitable Trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 and Societies Registration Act, 1860. The assessee Trust is engaged in the field of education and it is also registered U/s 12AA of the Act. The assessee filed its return of income on 22/01/2016 declaring NIL income after claiming exemption U/s 11 of the Act. The case of the assessee

SHRI MAHESH SEVA SAMITI ,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, AMRAVATI, AMRAVATI

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 403/NAG/2017[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Dec 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri S. S. Godaraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.403/Nag/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Mahesh Seva Samiti, Vs. Ito, Ward- 3, Amravati. Badnera Road, Amravati- 444601. Pan : Aaatm1457F Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Mahavir Atal : Revenue By : Shri G. J. Ninawe Date Of Hearing : 02.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.12.2022 आदेश / Order Per S. S. Godara, Jm: This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2010-11 Arises Against The Cit(A)-1, Nagpur’S Order Dated 28.09.2017 Passed In Case No. Cit(A)-1/508/2012-13, Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short “The Act”. Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused. 2. Coming To The Assessee’S Sole Substantive Grievance That Both The Learned Lower Authorities Have Erred In Law & On Facts In Denying Impugned Section 11 Exemption, It Is Noticed At The Outset

For Respondent: Shri G. J. Ninawe
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

section 2(15) of the I.T. Act & facts of the case. Accordingly, assessment of appellant’s income at Rs.9,56,000/- is, hereby, confirmed. 5.0 In the result, the appeal is dismissed.” 3 3. Learned counsel has taken pains to file detailed written submissions reads as follows :- “The appellant is a public charitable trust having aims of education, medical

MRS. BEANT KAUR JUNEJA,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), NAGPUR

The appeal of the assessee is ALLOWED

ITA 18/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 018/Nag/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Beantkaur Avtarsingh Juneja Hp Petrol Pump, Dosar Bhavan, C. A. Road, Nagpur-440002. Pan: Aflpj2956E . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

For Appellant: None for the AssesseeFor Respondent: Mr Abhay Marathe [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 24Section 246A(1)(a)Section 250Section 253(1)(a)Section 271BSection 273BSection 274(1)Section 44A

92 taxmann.com 400 & 2019, 416 ITR 155 (Mad.] which followed in ‘CIT Vs Smt S ITAT-Nagpur Page 3 of 6 Beantkaur Avtarsingh Juneja Vs ITO. Gowri’ [2020, 116 taxmann.com 764 & 417 ITR 45, Madras], wherein it has been categorically held that, penalty proceedings could not initiated and concluded against the legal representative of the deceased assessee. The former ratio