BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 60clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka456Delhi444Mumbai357Chennai216Bangalore215Ahmedabad126Jaipur126Chandigarh90Pune83Kolkata63Hyderabad58Lucknow46Cuttack39Cochin35Indore29Visakhapatnam27Amritsar27Calcutta17Allahabad14Agra13Surat13Telangana13Rajkot12SC8Jodhpur8Guwahati6Varanasi5Nagpur5Patna4Rajasthan2Panaji2Punjab & Haryana2Raipur2Andhra Pradesh2Jabalpur2Orissa1Dehradun1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 12A9Section 13(1)(c)6Exemption5Section 114Addition to Income3Section 12A(1)(ac)2Section 2632Section 402Section 13(3)2

LOKMANYA TILAD JANAKALYA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -2, NAGPUR

In the result, this appeal by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 384/NAG/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jan 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi..

For Appellant: Shri K.P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 1Section 11Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 40

60,12A64/- can be said .to have been received by the trust in 'excess, than what was given to the specified 'persons and' members of the Governing Council to the Assessee Trust. Further according to 'appellant no part of income of the appellant trust has been utilized for making the advances. 8.1 However it is evident that this argument

Charitable Trust2

THE AHBAB BAHU UDDESHIYA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,NAGPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS ), PUNE

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 160/NAG/2018[00]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Oct 2018

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri R.K. Baral
Section 12ASection 13aSection 2

charitable nature and its activities are carried out in accordance with its objects, then, there is no reason for the Commissioner to deny the benefit of registration under section 12A of the Act. In this regard, he relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in CIT(E) v/s Bayath Kutchhi Dasha Oswal Jain Mahajan Trust

VANDANIYA LAXMIBAI KELAR SMRUTI PRATISHTHAN,CHANDAPUR vs. ITO WARD-3,EXMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 628/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri A.G. PimparkhedeFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

60 days in filing this appeal before the Tribunal is hereby condoned and we proceed for adjudication. 3 Vandaniya Laxmibai Kelkar Smruti Pratishthan ITA no.605 & 628/Nag./2024 4. The statement of facts along with note of arguments as advanced by the learned Authorised Representative is culled out as under:– “1) The Vandaniya Laxmibai Kelar Smruti Pratishthan is charitable Trust with

VANDANIYA LAXMIBAI KELAR SMRUTI PRATISHTAN,CGANDRAPUR vs. ITO WARD-3, EXMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 605/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri A.G. PimparkhedeFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

60 days in filing this appeal before the Tribunal is hereby condoned and we proceed for adjudication. 3 Vandaniya Laxmibai Kelkar Smruti Pratishthan ITA no.605 & 628/Nag./2024 4. The statement of facts along with note of arguments as advanced by the learned Authorised Representative is culled out as under:– “1) The Vandaniya Laxmibai Kelar Smruti Pratishthan is charitable Trust with

VASUNDHARA BAHUUDESHIYA SAMAJIKK SANSTHA,KHAMGAON vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), NAGPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 55/NAG/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2015-16 Vasundhara Bahuudeshiya Vs. C.I.T.(Exemptions) Samajik Sanstha, Pune At Nagpur. 1, Vasundhara, Madhav Nagar, Khamgaon-444303. Pan No.: Aaabv 0305 P Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri Mahavir Atal (Ca) Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing: 27/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28/06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. C.I.T.(Exemptions), Pune At Nagpur Dated 23/03/2021 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) For The A.Y. 2015-16 Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Raised By The Assesee. “1. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit By Taking A Recourse To Section 263 Is Illegal & Bad In Law, When The A.O. Has Made Sufficient Enquiries During The Assessment Procedure. 2. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit, Without Considering Appellant’S Submission Is Illegal & Bad In Law. 3. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit Even Though If It Is Termed As Erroneous But It Is Not Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue. As The Donation Has Been Duly Disclosed By The Appellant In Their

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Atal (CA)For Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 253(5)Section 263

60 days from the date of service of order of Commissioner of Income Tax appeals for filing appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. In this case order has been received by the Appellant on 30/03/2021 and the appeal was filed on 28/06/2021 i.e. beyond the limit provided by the statute. However, the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide the order