BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 58clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka462Delhi456Mumbai271Bangalore159Chennai156Jaipur79Ahmedabad68Kolkata58Chandigarh51Hyderabad51Pune44Cochin37Lucknow34Cuttack17Indore16Calcutta16Visakhapatnam15Allahabad15Telangana10Agra8Rajkot8Nagpur7Amritsar6Surat6SC6Varanasi4Raipur3Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana2Jodhpur2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Patna1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Charitable Trust4Exemption4Addition to Income4Section 12A(1)(ac)2Section 12A2Section 122Section 69C2Section 682Condonation of Delay

SHREE GURURAGHAVENDRA SWAMY BHAJAN MANDAL,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 32/NAG/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Milind BhusariFor Respondent: Shri Rajiv Benjwal
Section 12

Section 12 A of the Act. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the learned CIT(Exemption) erred in ignoring the claimed purpose as Religious cum Charitable trust while rejecting the application of the assessee. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the learned CIT(Exemption) erred in concluding that

SHREE GURURAGHAVENDRA SWAMY BHAJAN MANDAL,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

2
ITA 31/NAG/2024[2023-24]Status: Disposed
ITAT Nagpur
18 Nov 2024
AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Milind BhusariFor Respondent: Shri Rajiv Benjwal
Section 12

Section 12 A of the Act. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the learned CIT(Exemption) erred in ignoring the claimed purpose as Religious cum Charitable trust while rejecting the application of the assessee. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the learned CIT(Exemption) erred in concluding that

SUNIL VISHAMBARNATH TIWARI,NAGPUR vs. I.T.O. WARD 1(4), NAGPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 240/NAG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur20 Dec 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri O.P. Kant, Am Assessment Year: 2009-10 Sunil Vishambaharnath Tiwari, Vs. I.T.O. 87, Panchvati Builders, Hindustan Ward 1(4), Colony, Wardha Road, Nagpur- Nagpur. 440015. Pan No.: Aalpt 0719 L Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri Mahavir Atal (Ca) Revenue By : Shri Vitthal Bhosale (Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing: 28/10/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 20/12/2021 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Nagpur Dated 30/05/2014 For The A.Y. 2009-10 Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Raised: “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Of The Assessee. 2. The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Endorsing The View Taken By The A.O. Of Disallowing Claim Of The Assessee. 3. Assessee Craves Leave To Add & Alter Any Other Ground That May Be Taken At The Time Of Hearing.” 2. In This Appeal, There Is Delay Of 363 Days In Filing The Present Appeal For Which The Assessee Has Filed An Application For Condoning The Delay & The Contents Of The Same Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Atal (CA)For Respondent: Shri Vitthal Bhosale (Sr.DR)
Section 253(5)

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust Vs CIT (207 ITR 368) (Bom)(HC) and stated that belated return filed under section 139(4) should be treated as return filed under section 139(1). Para 12 and 13 of the Judgment (Paper book Page No 58

VANDANIYA LAXMIBAI KELAR SMRUTI PRATISHTAN,CGANDRAPUR vs. ITO WARD-3, EXMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 605/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri A.G. PimparkhedeFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

58 years R/o. Chandrapur acting in the capacity of Secretary of M/s. Vandaniya Laxmibai Kelar Smruti Pratishthan, Mrunal Associates, Madhuban Plaza Building, Chandrapur-442401 solemnly affirm and state as under:- 1) That, the trust has applied before the Hon'ble CIT, Exemption, Pune for obtaining certificate in form 10AB under clause (iii) of first proviso sub-section

VANDANIYA LAXMIBAI KELAR SMRUTI PRATISHTHAN,CHANDAPUR vs. ITO WARD-3,EXMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 628/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri A.G. PimparkhedeFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

58 years R/o. Chandrapur acting in the capacity of Secretary of M/s. Vandaniya Laxmibai Kelar Smruti Pratishthan, Mrunal Associates, Madhuban Plaza Building, Chandrapur-442401 solemnly affirm and state as under:- 1) That, the trust has applied before the Hon'ble CIT, Exemption, Pune for obtaining certificate in form 10AB under clause (iii) of first proviso sub-section

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR vs. SHRI VINOD BALBHADRA GOENKA,, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 204/NAG/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Acit Vs. Shri Vinod Balbhadra Goenka Circle-4 247, Nandanvan Layout Nagpur Nagpur Pan No.:Aanpg 6841 N Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shri K.P. Dewani, Adv Date Of Hearing: 28/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal By Revenue Against Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Nagpur Dated 30/03/2017 In Appeal No.Cit(A)- 4/198/16-17 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Grounds Raised By The Revenue In This Appeal Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 10(38)Section 131Section 68Section 69C

Trust, had shown certain income by way of voluntary contributions. The CIT concerned passed an order u/s 263 of the IT Act, 1961 holding that the assessee is liable to be assessed on that sum as income from other sources. The said income was determined by CIT as unexplained cash credit u/s 68. The assessee approached the Hon’ble ITAT

UDAY MAHILA SEVA SANSTHA,UMRED vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(1), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 466/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur17 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Ms. Swati SharmaFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 11Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

Charitable Educational Institution and was registered under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The assessee was also registered under The Society Registration Act, 1860. The society is running educational institutions. The assessee, for the year under consideration, filed its returned of income on 25/03/2019, and also filed return of income in Form no.ITR-7. In the return total receipt