BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

18 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 27(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi516Mumbai481Karnataka470Chennai320Bangalore240Jaipur131Ahmedabad130Pune100Hyderabad90Kolkata80Chandigarh70Lucknow54Cochin43Cuttack42Visakhapatnam31Allahabad31Indore31Amritsar22Nagpur18Calcutta17Surat14Telangana14Rajkot13SC11Agra10Raipur9Jodhpur8Varanasi6Panaji5Kerala5Punjab & Haryana3Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh2Ranchi2Jabalpur2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 12A35Section 1134Section 26317Section 80G14Section 80G(5)14Section 14712Exemption12Section 35(1)(ii)10Addition to Income9

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 336/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

charitable or religious trust which forfeits 8 exemptions by virtue of the provisions of the IT Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c) and (d) of that Act, the said rate will not apply to the business profits of such trusts which

Section 143(1)6
Charitable Trust5
Survey u/s 133A5

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 335/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

charitable or religious trust which forfeits 8 exemptions by virtue of the provisions of the IT Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c) and (d) of that Act, the said rate will not apply to the business profits of such trusts which

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2 (1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 337/NAG/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Apr 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

charitable or religious trust which forfeits 8 exemptions by virtue of the provisions of the IT Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c) and (d) of that Act, the said rate will not apply to the business profits of such trusts which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE ( EXEMPTION ), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHRI DADASAHEB GAWAI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2/NAG/2018[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur11 Jul 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 115BSection 12A

d. In the remand proceedings in the remand report, The Asstt Commissioner of Income Tax stated that donors to whom summons were issued, most of them have given sufficient documents with respect to genuineness of transaction & their confirmation. On the abovementioned preposition assessee placed reliance on 1. Judgment of Hon‘ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow Bench ―A‖, Lucknow dated

URMI PANDIT CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD-1, EXEMPTION, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 631/NAG/2024[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M. These appeal by the assessee are emanating from the impugned order dated 13/11/2024 (in ITA no.629/Nag./2024) and orders of even date 18/11/2024 (in ITA no.629–630/Nag./2024), passed in Form no.10AB, by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, [“learned CIT(E)”], rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form

SANGHVI J J GULABCHAND CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD-1, EXEMPTION, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 629/NAG/2024[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M. These appeal by the assessee are emanating from the impugned order dated 13/11/2024 (in ITA no.629/Nag./2024) and orders of even date 18/11/2024 (in ITA no.629–630/Nag./2024), passed in Form no.10AB, by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, [“learned CIT(E)”], rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form

R S PANDIT AND DAMYANTI PANDIT CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD-1, EXEMP, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 630/NAG/2024[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M. These appeal by the assessee are emanating from the impugned order dated 13/11/2024 (in ITA no.629/Nag./2024) and orders of even date 18/11/2024 (in ITA no.629–630/Nag./2024), passed in Form no.10AB, by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, [“learned CIT(E)”], rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form

M/S BHAKTVASTAL SADGURU YOGIRAJ VASANTRAO GOPALRAO GHONGE MAHARAJ NYAS,,WARDHA vs. DY. C.I.T. CENTRL CIR.-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 40/NAG/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am 1) Ita No.: 040/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2011-12 2) Ita No.: 036/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2007-08 3) Ita No.: 037/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2008-09 4) Ita No.: 151/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2009-10 5) Ita No.: 152/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2010-11 6) Ita No.: 038/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2009-10 (143 R.W.S. 263) 7) Ita No.: 039/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2010-11 (143 R.W.S. 263) Bhaktvastal Sadguru Yogiraj Vasantrao Vs. The Dcit Gopalrao Ghonge Maharaj Nyas Central Circle 2(2) Mukteshwar, Behind Rashtrabhasha Nagpur Gharpure Layout, Nagri Bank Colony Wardha Pan No.:Aabtb 2675 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri K.P. Dewani, Ca Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M.

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(1)(d)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

2, Nagpur at Sr. No.31/59/0607. The appellant trust has submitted regular returns claiming exemption u/s 11 before the date of search at premises of Shri Vasantrao Ghonge on 28/01/2011. The appellant trust has submitted regular returns of income year after year and audited financial statements have been submitted along with income tax returns as well as with various statutory authorities

JANARDHAN SWAMI YOGABHYASI MANDAL NAGPUR,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 1 EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 608/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: S/Shri Saurabh a/wFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M. This appeal by the assessee is emanating from the impugned order dated 17/10/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, [“learned CIT(E)”]. 2. In its appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:– “1. On the facts and circumstances of the law, the CIT (Exemption), Pune is refusing the exemption

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

ITA 349/NAG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(2)

D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M. These appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned orders of even date 29/03/2024, passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") by the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur–1, Nagpur, [“learned PCIT”], for the assessment years 2016–17 and 2017–18. 2. Since both

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

ITA 350/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(2)

D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M. These appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned orders of even date 29/03/2024, passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") by the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur–1, Nagpur, [“learned PCIT”], for the assessment years 2016–17 and 2017–18. 2. Since both

HERD EDUCATIONAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 4(3), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 323/NAG/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Sept 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2023-24

For Appellant: Shri Shikha Loya, Ld. Amicus CuriaeFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Ld. Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 11(1)(c)Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 139(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

D E R Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member: This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 19.03.2025, impugned herein, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC) (in short Ld. Commissioner) u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2023- 24. 2. In the instant case, the Assessee

SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SEWA SAMITI,, CIVIL LINES, GONDIA BAZAR vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 275/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Dec 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil BahariFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 16/03/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”]. 2. In its appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:– “1. That the order passed rejecting the registration

SHRI VYANKANATH MAHARAJ SHIKSHAN SANSTHA MURTIZAPUR,AKOLA vs. ITO WARD - 2, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 398/NAG/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M. The instant appeal by the assessee is emanating from the impugned order dated 20/03/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, [“learned CIT(E)”]. 2. Following grounds have been raised by the assessee:– “1. The learned CIT (Exemption) Pune erred in not granting registration u/s 12A as applied with reference

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR vs. SHRI VINOD BALBHADRA GOENKA,, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 204/NAG/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Acit Vs. Shri Vinod Balbhadra Goenka Circle-4 247, Nandanvan Layout Nagpur Nagpur Pan No.:Aanpg 6841 N Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shri K.P. Dewani, Adv Date Of Hearing: 28/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal By Revenue Against Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Nagpur Dated 30/03/2017 In Appeal No.Cit(A)- 4/198/16-17 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Grounds Raised By The Revenue In This Appeal Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 10(38)Section 131Section 68Section 69C

27 to conclude that assessee has admitted that he is carrying on business in Real Estate. Hence he held that income/gain on selling of immovable properties is liable to be assessed as business income. Accordingly, the A.O. assessed surplus arising on sale of immovable properties as income under the head “Income from Business & Profession”. 6. Against the order passed

SHRI GO0VINDDAS GOVARDHANDAS DAGA,NAGPUR vs. A.C.I.T. CIRCLE 2, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for A

ITA 601/NAG/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 35(1)Section 35(1)(ii)

d) What influence the assessee to give this donation to this Institution other than deduction under section 35(1)(ii). (e) The appellants are not in this line of business and, therefore, it is difficult to understand the very purpose of this transaction undertaken by them. They have failed to explain how the cheques in their case were given

DY. C.I.T. CIR-.2, NAGPUR vs. SHRI GOVINDDAS GOVERDHAN DAGA, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for A

ITA 614/NAG/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 35(1)Section 35(1)(ii)

d) What influence the assessee to give this donation to this Institution other than deduction under section 35(1)(ii). (e) The appellants are not in this line of business and, therefore, it is difficult to understand the very purpose of this transaction undertaken by them. They have failed to explain how the cheques in their case were given

MRS. BEANT KAUR JUNEJA,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), NAGPUR

The appeal of the assessee is ALLOWED

ITA 18/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 018/Nag/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Beantkaur Avtarsingh Juneja Hp Petrol Pump, Dosar Bhavan, C. A. Road, Nagpur-440002. Pan: Aflpj2956E . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

For Appellant: None for the AssesseeFor Respondent: Mr Abhay Marathe [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 24Section 246A(1)(a)Section 250Section 253(1)(a)Section 271BSection 273BSection 274(1)Section 44A

D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; By this appeal challenges the DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 23/1047509176(1) dt. 18/11/2022 of the National Faceless Appellate Centre [‘NFAC’ hereinafter] for assessment year 2017-18 [‘AY’ hereinafter] passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’ hereinafter] confirming the levy of penalty u/s 271B of the Act. 2. Tersely stated facts of the case