BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 24clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi697Mumbai669Karnataka481Chennai354Bangalore313Ahmedabad229Jaipur187Pune184Kolkata160Hyderabad114Chandigarh84Cochin61Lucknow56Indore47Amritsar44Allahabad43Cuttack34Nagpur32Visakhapatnam31Rajkot30Surat29Raipur19Agra18Telangana17Calcutta16Patna15SC12Jodhpur12Dehradun8Panaji6Varanasi6Kerala5Punjab & Haryana4Rajasthan3Guwahati3Andhra Pradesh2Ranchi2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 12A61Section 26349Section 1139Exemption25Section 1018Addition to Income14Section 143(3)13Section 80G12Section 14712Section 80G(5)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE ( EXEMPTION ), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHRI DADASAHEB GAWAI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2/NAG/2018[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur11 Jul 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 115BSection 12A

section 2(24)(iia), does not maintain a record of the identity indicating name and address of the donors. Shri Dadasaheb Gawai Charitable Trust

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

10
Charitable Trust7
Limitation/Time-bar6
ITA 336/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: Disposed
ITAT Nagpur
03 Apr 2025
AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

section 164(2) provided in the statute, which are reproduced below for ready reference:– ―164(2) In the case of relevant income which is derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, [or which is of the nature referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2 (1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 337/NAG/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Apr 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

section 164(2) provided in the statute, which are reproduced below for ready reference:– ―164(2) In the case of relevant income which is derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, [or which is of the nature referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL-CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. JAYMAHAKALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 335/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 164(2)Section 69A

section 164(2) provided in the statute, which are reproduced below for ready reference:– ―164(2) In the case of relevant income which is derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, [or which is of the nature referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24

M/S BHAKTVASTAL SADGURU YOGIRAJ VASANTRAO GOPALRAO GHONGE MAHARAJ NYAS,,WARDHA vs. DY. C.I.T. CENTRL CIR.-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 40/NAG/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am 1) Ita No.: 040/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2011-12 2) Ita No.: 036/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2007-08 3) Ita No.: 037/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2008-09 4) Ita No.: 151/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2009-10 5) Ita No.: 152/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2010-11 6) Ita No.: 038/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2009-10 (143 R.W.S. 263) 7) Ita No.: 039/Nag/2017 - A.Y. 2010-11 (143 R.W.S. 263) Bhaktvastal Sadguru Yogiraj Vasantrao Vs. The Dcit Gopalrao Ghonge Maharaj Nyas Central Circle 2(2) Mukteshwar, Behind Rashtrabhasha Nagpur Gharpure Layout, Nagri Bank Colony Wardha Pan No.:Aabtb 2675 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri K.P. Dewani, Ca Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M.

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(1)(d)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

24 ITA 40,36,37,151,152,38 & 39/NAG/2017 BHAKTVASTAL SADGURU YOGIRAJ VASANTRAO GOPALRAO GHONGE MAHARAJ NYAS VS DCIT,CC-1(1), NAGPUR issued. In the case of charitable institution it is undisputed fact on record that income has to be determined in terms of provisions of section 11 of I.T. Act 1961. The expenditure incurred on objects of trust

ACIT ,CIRCLE (EXEMPTION ),NAGPUR , NAGPUR vs. M/S SIPNA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ,AMRAVAI , AMRAVATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed

ITA 223/NAG/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2013-14 The Acit, Vs. M/S. Sipnashikshan Prasarak Mandal Circle (Exemption), Badnera Road Amravati Amravati Pan No.:Aacts 1266 J Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shripiyushkolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shrihimeshdemble (Ca) Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28/06/2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Department Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit (A)-4, Nagpur Dated 27/03/2017 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y. 2013-14 Wherein The Department Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.

For Appellant: ShriHimeshDemble (CA)For Respondent: ShriPiyushKolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

charitable trust and is duly registered with office of the Charity Commissioner. The trust is also registered u/s 12A of The Income Tax Act, 1961 and is eligible for exemption u/s 11. The assessee trust is regularly assessed to Income Tax. For the year under consideration, the assessee trust had filed its return of income on 28.03.2014 vide acknowledgement

CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,NAGPUR,NAGPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), CIT (E), INCOME TAX OFFICE, PMT BUILDING, SHANKAR SETH ROAD, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assesee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 347/NAG/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur08 Jul 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Naresh Jakhotia, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Benjwal, CIT.Dr
Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable purpose and if it fulfils the following conditions, namely:- (vi) in relation to donations made after the 31st day of March, 1992, the institution or fund is for the time being approved by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner: Chinmaya Seva Trust vrs CIT (EXEMPTION) ITA no.347/Nag./2023 Provided that the institution or fund referred to in clause (vi) shall

JANARDHAN SWAMI YOGABHYASI MANDAL NAGPUR,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 1 EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 608/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: S/Shri Saurabh a/wFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

section 12A on 04/10/1983 in old regime of trust provisions and on 29/03/2022 under new regime of trust provisions, the copy of registration certificates are enclosed at page no. 7 to 10. 5) The trust was also holding certificate u/s 80G of Income tax Act under old regime which was renewed on 29/09/2005 and again renewed on 21/10/2011, the copies

SHREE GURURAGHAVENDRA SWAMY BHAJAN MANDAL,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 31/NAG/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Milind BhusariFor Respondent: Shri Rajiv Benjwal
Section 12

24) Shree Gururaghavendra Swamy Bhajan Mandal, North Ambazari Rd. ……………. Appellant Near Shankar Nagar Square Nagpur 400 010 PAN – AAFTS9231E v/s Commissioner of Income Tax ……………. Respondent Exemption, Pune Assessee by : Shri Milind Bhusari Revenue by : Shri Rajiv Benjwal Date of Hearing – 05/11/2024 Date of Order – 18/11/2024 O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M. This appeal has been filed

SHREE GURURAGHAVENDRA SWAMY BHAJAN MANDAL,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 32/NAG/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Milind BhusariFor Respondent: Shri Rajiv Benjwal
Section 12

24) Shree Gururaghavendra Swamy Bhajan Mandal, North Ambazari Rd. ……………. Appellant Near Shankar Nagar Square Nagpur 400 010 PAN – AAFTS9231E v/s Commissioner of Income Tax ……………. Respondent Exemption, Pune Assessee by : Shri Milind Bhusari Revenue by : Shri Rajiv Benjwal Date of Hearing – 05/11/2024 Date of Order – 18/11/2024 O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M. This appeal has been filed

HERD EDUCATIONAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 4(3), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 323/NAG/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Sept 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2023-24

For Appellant: Shri Shikha Loya, Ld. Amicus CuriaeFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Ld. Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 11(1)(c)Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 139(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

24. 2. In the instant case, the Assessee had claimed the amount of Rs.6,50,000/- as exempt, however, the same was disallowed by the CPC vide order dated 18.11.2024 u/s 143(1) of the Act, which was subsequently affirmed by the Ld. Commissioner vide order dated 20.01.2025 u/s 154 of the Act. 2 M/s. Herd Educational & Medical Research Foundation

VASUNDHARA BAHUUDESHIYA SAMAJIKK SANSTHA,KHAMGAON vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), NAGPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 55/NAG/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2015-16 Vasundhara Bahuudeshiya Vs. C.I.T.(Exemptions) Samajik Sanstha, Pune At Nagpur. 1, Vasundhara, Madhav Nagar, Khamgaon-444303. Pan No.: Aaabv 0305 P Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri Mahavir Atal (Ca) Revenue By : Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing: 27/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28/06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. C.I.T.(Exemptions), Pune At Nagpur Dated 23/03/2021 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) For The A.Y. 2015-16 Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Raised By The Assesee. “1. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit By Taking A Recourse To Section 263 Is Illegal & Bad In Law, When The A.O. Has Made Sufficient Enquiries During The Assessment Procedure. 2. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit, Without Considering Appellant’S Submission Is Illegal & Bad In Law. 3. Whether The Revision Order Passed By The Ld. Pr.Cit Even Though If It Is Termed As Erroneous But It Is Not Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue. As The Donation Has Been Duly Disclosed By The Appellant In Their

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Atal (CA)For Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 253(5)Section 263

charitable trust, duly registered under section 12A of the Act. The assessee trust received donation of Rs 1,23,29,000/- from 725 persons and the assessee submitted details of the doners, with their names and addresses. The A.O. issued 145 notices to the 20% of the donors to verify the veracity of the donations. Out of 145 donors

SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SEWA SAMITI,, CIVIL LINES, GONDIA BAZAR vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 275/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Dec 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil BahariFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

section 12A(i)(ac)(vi) of the Act is valid, the factual contours are narrated below:– “1. The appellant is a Society registered under the Society Registration Act, 1860 and also registered under the Mumbai Public Trust Registration Act, 1950 on 26th March, 2009 and is functioning since then. 2. The Society was formed with the following objects

SHREE SANT BHOJAJI MAHARAJ DEOSTHAN AJANSARA,WARDHA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE AT NGP, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

ITA 186/NAG/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Apr 2026AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh& Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 263

charitable trust even through eligible to claim deduction without 12A/12AA as corpus donation as capital receipts and not taxable irrespective of the fact that assessee registered under section 12A/12AA of the Act. 18. We are of the considered opinion that keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case and in particular, having regard to the fact that

SHREE SANT BHOJAJI MAHARAJ DEOSTHAN AJANSARA,WARDHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) -4, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

ITA 211/NAG/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Apr 2026AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh& Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 263

charitable trust even through eligible to claim deduction without 12A/12AA as corpus donation as capital receipts and not taxable irrespective of the fact that assessee registered under section 12A/12AA of the Act. 18. We are of the considered opinion that keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case and in particular, having regard to the fact that

SHREE SANT BHOJAJI MAHARAJ DEOSTHAN AJANSARA,WARDHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) - 4, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

ITA 212/NAG/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Apr 2026AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh& Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 263

charitable trust even through eligible to claim deduction without 12A/12AA as corpus donation as capital receipts and not taxable irrespective of the fact that assessee registered under section 12A/12AA of the Act. 18. We are of the considered opinion that keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case and in particular, having regard to the fact that

AGRAWAL SEVA SAMITI ,PARATWADA vs. C.I.T. EXEMPTIONS , PUNE

Appeals are ALLOWED FOR STATISTCIAL

ITA 375/NAG/2019[00]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing From Pune) आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.357/Pun/2019 Modern Education Society, C/O. Pawan Nagar, Navi Basti, Badnera Dist-Amravati, Amravati – 444 701. . . . . . . .अपीलाथी / Appellant Pan: Aactt6288M

For Appellant: None for 357, Mr R B Atal for 375For Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojia [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 80G

24 of ITAT- Rules, 1963 with able assistance from the Revenue. 3. During the course of hearing, a common threadbare issue in both these appeals came to the attention, for the reason, two appeals are taken up together for the sake of brevity and for a common & consolidated order. We first deal with ITA No. 357/NAG/2019 as lead case, resultantly

MODERN EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BADNERA vs. CIT.(EXEMPTION), PUNE

Appeals are ALLOWED FOR STATISTCIAL

ITA 357/NAG/2019[00]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing From Pune) आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.357/Pun/2019 Modern Education Society, C/O. Pawan Nagar, Navi Basti, Badnera Dist-Amravati, Amravati – 444 701. . . . . . . .अपीलाथी / Appellant Pan: Aactt6288M

For Appellant: None for 357, Mr R B Atal for 375For Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojia [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 80G

24 of ITAT- Rules, 1963 with able assistance from the Revenue. 3. During the course of hearing, a common threadbare issue in both these appeals came to the attention, for the reason, two appeals are taken up together for the sake of brevity and for a common & consolidated order. We first deal with ITA No. 357/NAG/2019 as lead case, resultantly

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

ITA 349/NAG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(2)

Charitable Trust (land owner) on 31.08.2015. The learned CIT has observed that, valuation of cost of free construction to the land owner as per ready reckoner as mentioned in the agreement of Rs. 2,81,33,000/- has been allegedly included in the land cost and shown as work-in-progress in the profit and loss account totalling to Rs.15

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

ITA 350/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(2)

Charitable Trust (land owner) on 31.08.2015. The learned CIT has observed that, valuation of cost of free construction to the land owner as per ready reckoner as mentioned in the agreement of Rs. 2,81,33,000/- has been allegedly included in the land cost and shown as work-in-progress in the profit and loss account totalling to Rs.15