BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 147clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai152Delhi114Chennai111Hyderabad60Pune59Ahmedabad50Jaipur46Bangalore38Allahabad28Kolkata26Chandigarh25Indore18Raipur16Rajkot15Cochin11Agra10Visakhapatnam7Lucknow6Surat6Nagpur6Patna6Guwahati6SC5Jodhpur3Cuttack3Amritsar2Dehradun1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 26316Section 14716Section 1486Section 116Section 105Section 143(1)4Section 143(3)4Section 12A4Reopening of Assessment4Addition to Income

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

ITA 349/NAG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(2)

147 of the Act. This is for the reason that, by issuing notice under section 263, the issues which were not subject matter of re-assessment proceedings, were sought to be revised and hence, the limitation period would run from intimation order passed under section 143(1) of the Act. The learned Counsel, in support of these arguments, placed reliance

4
Exemption3
Reassessment2

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

ITA 350/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(2)

147 of the Act. This is for the reason that, by issuing notice under section 263, the issues which were not subject matter of re-assessment proceedings, were sought to be revised and hence, the limitation period would run from intimation order passed under section 143(1) of the Act. The learned Counsel, in support of these arguments, placed reliance

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. VINODKUMAR RAJENDRALAL KOCHHAR, KAMPTEE

In the result, the appeal filed by the department is dismissed

ITA 386/NAG/2023[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jul 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 44A

Charitable Trust vs. ACIT (E) (2017) 59 ITR 204 Mum) (Trib) (b) Construction Co. vs. ACIT (2017) 188 TTJ 497 (Mum.) (Trib.) (c) M/s. Advance Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. [INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77 OF 2014; dt 28/6/2016 (Bom)(HC)] (d) Marico Ltd (Supreme Court) [Approved Bombay High Court decision Writ petition 1917 of 2019 dt 21/08/2019]. In view

SHRI GANPATI DEOSTHAN TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD- 1,EXEMP,NAGPUR, NAGPUR

ITA 685/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri Madhav Vichare, CA
Section 11Section 12ASection 147

sections": [ "147", "144", "148A", "69A", "193", "11" ], "issues": "Whether the CIT(A) erred in confirming the AO's order, including additions made on account of cash deposits and interest, when the assessee claims to be a charitable trust

SHRI GANPATI DEOSTHAN TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD- 1, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

ITA 684/NAG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri Madhav Vichare, CA
Section 11Section 12ASection 147

charitable trust and the entire cash deposit was added without considering expenses. The Tribunal considered that every assessee deserves a fair chance to present their case.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "147

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE (EXEMPTIONS), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. VASANTRAO NAIK STATE AGRICULTURE EXTENTION MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 208/NAG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Shubham JainFor Respondent: Shri Anand Nagrale
Section 10Section 10(23)Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148A

147 due to the non-fling of return of income and the notice u/s 148 was issued on 30/03/2022 in response to which the appellant has fled the return of income on 11/10/2022 declaring total income of Rs. Nil, after claiming deduction u/s 10(23C) (iiiab). During the assessing proceedings various notices were issued to the appellant requesting to furnish