BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 144clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka457Delhi159Chennai88Mumbai80Jaipur70Bangalore70Ahmedabad52Pune38Hyderabad35Chandigarh31Lucknow26Allahabad21Kolkata19Amritsar17Calcutta16Cuttack16Cochin14Indore12Visakhapatnam9Rajkot9Agra7Raipur6Nagpur5Surat3Telangana3Jodhpur2Patna2Rajasthan2Varanasi2Jabalpur2SC1Dehradun1Guwahati1Andhra Pradesh1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 26316Section 14715Section 116Section 143(3)4Section 1484Section 12A4Section 143(1)4Reopening of Assessment4Addition to Income

SHRI GANPATI DEOSTHAN TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD- 1,EXEMP,NAGPUR, NAGPUR

ITA 685/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri Madhav Vichare, CA
Section 11Section 12ASection 147

sections": [ "147", "144", "148A", "69A", "193", "11" ], "issues": "Whether the CIT(A) erred in confirming the AO's order, including additions made on account of cash deposits and interest, when the assessee claims to be a charitable trust

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

ITA 349/NAG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Oct 2024
3
Section 142(1)2
Cash Deposit2
Charitable Trust2
AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(2)

Charitable Trust and has made payment of Rs. 15,33,33,000/-, the source of payment is not explained viz a viz income shown in the ITR for previous years. Therefore, income for A.Y. 2016-17 has escaped assessment. In the view of the above, I have reasons to believe that the income to the tune of Rs.15

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

ITA 350/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 263(2)

Charitable Trust and has made payment of Rs. 15,33,33,000/-, the source of payment is not explained viz a viz income shown in the ITR for previous years. Therefore, income for A.Y. 2016-17 has escaped assessment. In the view of the above, I have reasons to believe that the income to the tune of Rs.15

SHRI GANPATI DEOSTHAN TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD- 1, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

ITA 684/NAG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri Madhav Vichare, CA
Section 11Section 12ASection 147

charitable trust and the entire cash deposit was added without considering expenses. The Tribunal considered that every assessee deserves a fair chance to present their case.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "147", "144

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. VINODKUMAR RAJENDRALAL KOCHHAR, KAMPTEE

In the result, the appeal filed by the department is dismissed

ITA 386/NAG/2023[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jul 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 44A

Charitable Trust vs. ACIT (E) (2017) 59 ITR 204 Mum) (Trib) (b) Construction Co. vs. ACIT (2017) 188 TTJ 497 (Mum.) (Trib.) (c) M/s. Advance Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. [INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77 OF 2014; dt 28/6/2016 (Bom)(HC)] (d) Marico Ltd (Supreme Court) [Approved Bombay High Court decision Writ petition 1917 of 2019 dt 21/08/2019]. In view