BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 12(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka366Mumbai173Pune132Delhi111Ahmedabad103Jaipur88Hyderabad86Chennai62Rajkot59Bangalore56Surat41Kolkata39Amritsar31Chandigarh29Calcutta16Nagpur15Cochin13Visakhapatnam10Jodhpur10Panaji9Telangana8Agra8Cuttack7Indore7Lucknow5Patna5Raipur5Varanasi4SC4Dehradun3Ranchi3Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana2Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 12A41Section 80G(5)18Exemption14Section 12A(1)(ac)8Section 80G8Charitable Trust6Addition to Income4Section 123Section 113

VANDANIYA LAXMIBAI KELAR SMRUTI PRATISHTHAN,CHANDAPUR vs. ITO WARD-3,EXMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 628/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri A.G. PimparkhedeFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable trust it applied for the registration on 24/01/2024 under Item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of Income tax. The copy of receipt along with the form for registration is given on page no. 12

VANDANIYA LAXMIBAI KELAR SMRUTI PRATISHTAN,CGANDRAPUR vs. ITO WARD-3, EXMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Section 69C2
Section 682
Deduction2
ITA 605/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri A.G. PimparkhedeFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable trust it applied for the registration on 24/01/2024 under Item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of Income tax. The copy of receipt along with the form for registration is given on page no. 12

SHREE GURURAGHAVENDRA SWAMY BHAJAN MANDAL,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 31/NAG/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Milind BhusariFor Respondent: Shri Rajiv Benjwal
Section 12

section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed. 8. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. ITA no.32/Nag./2024 Assessee’s Appeal 9. In its appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:– “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law the learned CIT(Exemption) erred

SHREE GURURAGHAVENDRA SWAMY BHAJAN MANDAL,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 32/NAG/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Milind BhusariFor Respondent: Shri Rajiv Benjwal
Section 12

section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed. 8. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. ITA no.32/Nag./2024 Assessee’s Appeal 9. In its appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:– “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the law the learned CIT(Exemption) erred

CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,NAGPUR,NAGPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), CIT (E), INCOME TAX OFFICE, PMT BUILDING, SHANKAR SETH ROAD, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assesee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 347/NAG/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur08 Jul 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Naresh Jakhotia, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Benjwal, CIT.Dr
Section 80GSection 80G(5)

12,14,15,16,17,23,26,28 are religious in nature. Also, the expenditure allocated to these religious activities has consistently exceeded 5% over the past three years. In light of this observation, it is evident that the trust does not meet the conditions outlined in clause (ii) of section 80G(5) when read in conjunction with Explanation

JANARDHAN SWAMI YOGABHYASI MANDAL NAGPUR,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 1 EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 608/NAG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: S/Shri Saurabh a/wFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

12 for any previous year ending on or before the date of such application, at any time after the commencement of such activities.' 16) It is further submitted that, the Hon'ble CIT was correct in sign that the activities of the trust commenced prior to 01/04/2021. However the trust has obtained provisional registration under the new regime after 01/04/2021

GOSPEL INDIA MINISTERIES,CHANDRAPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 267/NAG/2024[00-00]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jan 2025

Bench: Shri V. Durgarao & Shrik.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Sapan UsretheFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

1)(ac)(vi) in any other case, where activities of the trust or institution have- (A) ...... (B) commenced and no income or part thereof of the said trust or institution has been excluded from the total income on account of applicability of sub-clause (iv) or subclause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub- clause (via) of clause

GOSPEL INDIA MINISTRIES,CHANDRAPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 563/NAG/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jan 2025

Bench: Shri V. Durgarao & Shrik.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Sapan UsretheFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

1)(ac)(vi) in any other case, where activities of the trust or institution have- (A) ...... (B) commenced and no income or part thereof of the said trust or institution has been excluded from the total income on account of applicability of sub-clause (iv) or subclause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub- clause (via) of clause

ACIT ,CIRCLE (EXEMPTION ),NAGPUR , NAGPUR vs. M/S SIPNA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ,AMRAVAI , AMRAVATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed

ITA 223/NAG/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2013-14 The Acit, Vs. M/S. Sipnashikshan Prasarak Mandal Circle (Exemption), Badnera Road Amravati Amravati Pan No.:Aacts 1266 J Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shripiyushkolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shrihimeshdemble (Ca) Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28/06/2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Department Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit (A)-4, Nagpur Dated 27/03/2017 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y. 2013-14 Wherein The Department Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.

For Appellant: ShriHimeshDemble (CA)For Respondent: ShriPiyushKolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

TRUST 1. REVENUE EXPENDITURE 16,77,59,515 (EXCLUDING DEPRECIATION) 2. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (NET) 4,39,97,911 B 21,17,57,426 (1,84,36,668 A - B TOTAL INCOME ) OR SAY NIL In other words, the assessee humbly submits before your honour that even if the voluntary contributions received by the assessee are treated as income, the same

SOCIAL EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE ASSOCIATION,YAVATMAL vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 71/NAG/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Apr 2026

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

For Appellant: Shri P.M. Gandhi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G(5)

1)(ac)(vi) and for regular approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) have been rejected. ITA Nos. 71 & 72/NAG/2025 (Social Educational and Welfare Association) 2. The assessee is a trust, filed applications seeking registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. A notice was issued

SOCIAL EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE ASSOCIATION,YAVATMAL vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 72/NAG/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Apr 2026

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

For Appellant: Shri P.M. Gandhi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G(5)

1)(ac)(vi) and for regular approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) have been rejected. ITA Nos. 71 & 72/NAG/2025 (Social Educational and Welfare Association) 2. The assessee is a trust, filed applications seeking registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. A notice was issued

THE NEPHROLOGY SOCIETY,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 339/NAG/2024[N.A]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)Section 36A(3)

section 12A(1)(ac) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is hereby cancelled.” 3 The Nephrology Society ITA no.339/Nag./2024 4. Shri Kapil Hirani, learned Counsel for the assessee concluded his argument by stating that the order is unsustainable. The learned Counsel furnished a note showing activities carried out by the Society, which reads as under:– “1. Providing Relief

SHRI VYANKANATH MAHARAJ SHIKSHAN SANSTHA MURTIZAPUR,AKOLA vs. ITO WARD - 2, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 398/NAG/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

1)(ac) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is hereby cancelled.” 6. Before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee filed a gist of submissions which is also reproduced below:– “Application for post facto approval of loans to Charity Commissioner filed on 23/02/2024 is submitted before CIT(Exemption) on 24/02/2024. B) It has not been considered before Rejection

MAHA ACADAMY OF PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY,NAGPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 217/NAG/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Mar 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roymaha Academy Of Pediatric Cit (Exemptions), Pune Neurology, Plot No.7, Block Vs Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, Guru Balawantsing Compound, Near Lokmat Building, Patwardhan Ground, Nagpur-440012. Pan : Aaqam 4626 H Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri Pranav Ashtikar, Ca Revenue By : Shri Pankaj Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 24.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.03.2026

For Appellant: Shri Pranav Ashtikar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

12(A)(1)(ac)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) has been rejected. ITA No. 217/NAG/20245 (Maha Academy of Pediatric Neurology) 2. Brief facts of the case are that assessee-society has filed an application before the Ld. CIT(E) in Form No. 10AB for registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR vs. SHRI VINOD BALBHADRA GOENKA,, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 204/NAG/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Acit Vs. Shri Vinod Balbhadra Goenka Circle-4 247, Nandanvan Layout Nagpur Nagpur Pan No.:Aanpg 6841 N Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shri K.P. Dewani, Adv Date Of Hearing: 28/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal By Revenue Against Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Nagpur Dated 30/03/2017 In Appeal No.Cit(A)- 4/198/16-17 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Grounds Raised By The Revenue In This Appeal Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 10(38)Section 131Section 68Section 69C

Trust, had shown certain income by way of voluntary contributions. The CIT concerned passed an order u/s 263 of the IT Act, 1961 holding that the assessee is liable to be assessed on that sum as income from other sources. The said income was determined by CIT as unexplained cash credit u/s 68. The assessee approached the Hon’ble ITAT