BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi251Mumbai174Chennai128Bangalore93Jaipur87Karnataka87Hyderabad76Ahmedabad49Chandigarh45Kolkata45Cochin36Pune35Lucknow24Visakhapatnam22Allahabad12Indore12Amritsar9Agra8Cuttack8Nagpur8Raipur8Rajkot8Patna6Surat4Jodhpur4Telangana3SC2Varanasi2Guwahati1Calcutta1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1Kerala1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 26330Section 35(1)(ii)10Section 12A8Addition to Income8Section 143(3)7Section 117Exemption6Section 35(1)4Section 2503

SHRI GANPATI DEOSTHAN TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD- 1, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

ITA 684/NAG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri Madhav Vichare, CA
Section 11Section 12ASection 147

cash deposit in bank us 69A of the Act\neven when the assessee is DEVSTHAN (PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST)\nand source

SHRI GANPATI DEOSTHAN TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD- 1,EXEMP,NAGPUR, NAGPUR

ITA 685/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri Madhav Vichare, CA
Section 11
Limitation/Time-bar3
Condonation of Delay3
Charitable Trust3
Section 12A
Section 147

cash deposit in bank us 69A of the Act\neven when the assessee is DEVSTHAN (PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST)\nand source

ACIT ,CIRCLE (EXEMPTION ),NAGPUR , NAGPUR vs. M/S SIPNA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ,AMRAVAI , AMRAVATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed

ITA 223/NAG/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2013-14 The Acit, Vs. M/S. Sipnashikshan Prasarak Mandal Circle (Exemption), Badnera Road Amravati Amravati Pan No.:Aacts 1266 J Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shripiyushkolhe (Cit-Dr) Assessee By: Shrihimeshdemble (Ca) Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28/06/2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Department Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit (A)-4, Nagpur Dated 27/03/2017 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y. 2013-14 Wherein The Department Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.

For Appellant: ShriHimeshDemble (CA)For Respondent: ShriPiyushKolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation made with a specific direction that such donation is for any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution run by such trust or institution. 7 ACIT, CIR (EXEMPTION), NAGPUR VS SIPNA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, AMRAVATI (3) For the purpose of this section, "anonymous donation" means any voluntary contribution

SHREE SANT BHOJAJI MAHARAJ DEOSTHAN AJANSARA,WARDHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) -4, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

ITA 211/NAG/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Apr 2026AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh& Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 263

charitable trust, registered under Society Registration Act, 1860 in the office of Charity Commissioner, Wardha. The assessee filed return of income for the A.Y 2015-16 on 31.03.2017 declaring total income at Rs. 56,69,660/- claiming deduction u/s. 11(1)(d) at Rs. 47,08,027/-. The Trust has been established for the remembrances of late Shri Bhojaji Maharaj

SHREE SANT BHOJAJI MAHARAJ DEOSTHAN AJANSARA,WARDHA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE AT NGP, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

ITA 186/NAG/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Apr 2026AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh& Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 263

charitable trust, registered under Society Registration Act, 1860 in the office of Charity Commissioner, Wardha. The assessee filed return of income for the A.Y 2015-16 on 31.03.2017 declaring total income at Rs. 56,69,660/- claiming deduction u/s. 11(1)(d) at Rs. 47,08,027/-. The Trust has been established for the remembrances of late Shri Bhojaji Maharaj

SHREE SANT BHOJAJI MAHARAJ DEOSTHAN AJANSARA,WARDHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) - 4, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

ITA 212/NAG/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Apr 2026AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh& Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 263

charitable trust, registered under Society Registration Act, 1860 in the office of Charity Commissioner, Wardha. The assessee filed return of income for the A.Y 2015-16 on 31.03.2017 declaring total income at Rs. 56,69,660/- claiming deduction u/s. 11(1)(d) at Rs. 47,08,027/-. The Trust has been established for the remembrances of late Shri Bhojaji Maharaj

SHRI GO0VINDDAS GOVARDHANDAS DAGA,NAGPUR vs. A.C.I.T. CIRCLE 2, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for A

ITA 601/NAG/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 35(1)Section 35(1)(ii)

deposited the same in a different bank account to which the assessee failed to furnish any explanation. Further on perusal of computation of income the AO further noted that assessee had substantial interest income which has been reduced by making bogus claim of Rs. 175 lakhs u/s. 35(1)(ii) of the Act. Thus, taking into consideration all these cumulative

DY. C.I.T. CIR-.2, NAGPUR vs. SHRI GOVINDDAS GOVERDHAN DAGA, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for A

ITA 614/NAG/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 35(1)Section 35(1)(ii)

deposited the same in a different bank account to which the assessee failed to furnish any explanation. Further on perusal of computation of income the AO further noted that assessee had substantial interest income which has been reduced by making bogus claim of Rs. 175 lakhs u/s. 35(1)(ii) of the Act. Thus, taking into consideration all these cumulative