BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80A(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai82Ahmedabad49Delhi36Bangalore36Hyderabad21Jaipur14Rajkot11Kolkata9Amritsar7Chennai6Pune6Lucknow6Guwahati5Surat4SC4Karnataka2Cochin2Nagpur2Indore1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 80I9Section 80P(2)2Section 143(2)2Section 143(3)2Deduction2

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5, NAGPUR vs. THE NIRMAL UJWAL CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal for the A

ITA 391/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur27 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Vikash Agrawal
Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

gains of business attributable to the business of providing banking and credit facilities to the members of society. Therefore, even if certain expenses are disallowed, it will result in increase in gross taxable income and deduction under section 80P, would be allowable on 100% of such gross taxable income. 5.5 This jurisprudence is also endorsed by the Pune Tribunal

DCIT-AKOLA-CIRCLE, ,, AKOLA vs. SHRI HARMITSINGH BHAGWANSINGH SETHI,, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 266/NAG/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.K. Bansal & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay ThakkarFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194CSection 80I

80A(4) of the Act. Before going further, we deem it fit to 5 Shri Harmitsingh Bhagwansingh Sethi reproduce the finding of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) on these issues. “9.0 On careful examination of the facts, it is seen that the appellant is a Contractor for electrical infrastructures. The appellant is engaged in the work of developing electrical distribution infrastructure