BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai459Delhi366Chennai152Jaipur127Ahmedabad126Bangalore116Karnataka110Kolkata78Chandigarh62Calcutta51Hyderabad48Raipur33Pune24Cochin22Indore18Guwahati16Rajkot16Surat13Visakhapatnam12Lucknow10Agra9Telangana8Nagpur7SC6Varanasi6Amritsar5Cuttack4Jodhpur4Ranchi3Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)21Section 153A12Section 69C6Section 10(38)6Section 686Section 69B4Addition to Income4Section 115B2Section 2502Long Term Capital Gains

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. SHIKHA INDRAKUMAR AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 239/NAG/2023[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur10 Apr 2026

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68Section 69C

capital gains as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act. The tribunal while dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue also observed on facts that these shares were purchased by respondent on the floor of Stock Exchange and not from the said broker, deliveries were taken, contract notes were issued and shares were also sold on the floor

2
Penny Stock2
Exemption2

DCIT-CC-2(1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. INDRAKUMAR GHISULAL AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 220/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur10 Apr 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68Section 69C

capital gains as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act. The tribunal while dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue also observed on facts that these shares were purchased by respondent on the floor of Stock Exchange and not from the said broker, deliveries were taken, contract notes were issued and shares were also sold on the floor

SHRI VISHWAKARAMA JEWELLERS ,AKOLA vs. DCIT AKOLA CIRCLE, AKOLA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 99/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri S.G. GandhiFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha
Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(3)Section 69B

206 6 Shri Vishwakarma Jewellers ITA no.99/Nag./2025 ITD 289, and had propounded their meticulous findings as narrated below vide their judgment dated 23/01/2024. “13. Heard. To appreciate the aforesaid rival positions, we refer to the provisions of Section 69A of the Act. Section 69A provides that where in any financial year the Assessee is found to be the owner

RAMKRUSHNA ZILBAJI THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WRAD -4(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 207/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur15 Jul 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Dr. Milind Bhusare, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 68

capital gain in view of investment in specified assets 8. That affidavit of both witnesses to said agreement to sale were submitted and are on record In such situation, it is submitted that observation of the CIT appeal that assessee failed to discharge his onus is not correct. 27. Further the CIT appeal confirmed the action of AD under Section

ATUL MANOHARRAO YAMSANWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

ITA 256/NAG/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

206, 2nd Floor, AayakarBhawan,\nCivil Lines, Nagpur 440 001\nF.No. Addl.CIT CR-2/NGP/Yamsanwar Gr./AMY/2021-22\nDated: 16.07.2021\nCONFIDENTIAL\nTo\nSir,\nThe Addl. Director of Income Tax (Inv.),\nNagpur\nSub: Search u/s 132(1) conducted in Yamsanwar Group of cases\nnote in the case of Shri Atul Manohar Yamsanwar reg.-\ndeviation\n2.\nKindly refer to the above subject.\nKindly find

ATUL MANOHARRAO YAMSANWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

ITA 251/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2025AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 153A

206, 2nd Floor, AayakarBhawan, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 F.No. Addl.CIT CR-2/NGP/Yamsanwar Gr./AMY/2021-22 Dated: 16.07.2021 CONFIDENTIAL To Sir, The Addl. Director of Income Tax (Inv.), Nagpur Sub: Search u/s 132(1) conducted in Yamsanwar Group of cases deviation note in the case of Shri Atul Manohar Yamsanwar reg.- Kindly refer to the above subject. 2. Kindly find

UMESH SADASHIV THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

ITA 240/NAG/2022[F.Y.2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2025
Section 143(3)Section 153A

206, 2nd Floor, AayakarBhawan, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 F.No. Addl.CIT CR-2/NGP/Yamsanwar Gr./AMY/2021-22 Dated: 16.07.2021 CONFIDENTIAL To Sir, The Addl. Director of Income Tax (Inv.), Nagpur Sub: Search u/s 132(1) conducted in Yamsanwar Group of cases deviation note in the case of Shri Atul Manohar Yamsanwar reg.- Kindly refer to the above subject. 2. Kindly find