SUBHASHCHAND CHANDAK (HUF),NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

capital gain : ` 2,00,000 Total Income Assessed : ` 4,20,006 Rounded off u/s 288A : ` 4,20,010 Tax calculation: As per tax calculation sheet enclosed” 5.2 On perusal of the ground no.5, of grounds of appeal and the computation of income as per para 5 of the assessment order, it is observed that there is no specific mention

SMS TOLLS AND DEVELOPERS,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD 1(5), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed in terms indicated above

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

capital gains is not to wait for the end of the previous year. Similarly, there can be income from other sources also such as receipt of dividend income or interest which may not have to wait for determination at the end of the year. Similarly, some subsidy may be received from the Government which may be taxable on receipt basis

JAGDISH KANHAIYALAL KHUSHALANI,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(3) NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad

rectification order dated 11.09.2020 passed u/s. 154 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2019-20 (A.Y.) 2. The sole grievance of the assessee is against the addition u/s. 50C of the Act at ₹ 22,32,000/- for the difference in stamp duty valuation of immovable property and the sale consideration received by the assessee. 2 ITA.No.690/NAG/2025 (Jagdish Kanhaiyalal

DY COMMISSIONER OF INOCME TAX , CIRCLE -2, NAGPUR vs. M/S N KUMAR CONSTRUCTION CO .PVT.LTD , NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

154 of Paper Book. iv. The appellant respectfully submits that all the shares allotted to Avance Technologies Limited were amount received earlier in A.Y. 2010-11 towards advance against booking of property and later on booking were cancelled and allotment of shares were made against the said amount during the previous year relevant to Asstt. Year 2012-13. The appellant

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, NAGPUR vs. M/S VICTRANS ENGINEERS, NAGPUR

The appeal of the Revenue is ALLOWED FOR STATISTCIAL PURPOSES

Bench: Shri Parth Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing From Pune) आयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 08/Nag/2020 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Dy. Cit, Circle -3, Nagpur . . . . . . .अपऩलधर्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/S M/S. Victrans Engineers, C/O. Swapan Datta, 16, Vidya Vihar Colony, Pratap Nagar, Nappur – 440 022. Pan: Aaafv6800F . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent

rectification dt. 25/02/2016 passed u/s 154 r.w.s. 144 of the Act by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1), Nagpur [‘AO’ in short]. 2. During the course of virtual hearing, the case called twice, despite service of notice none appeared at assessee’s behest. In the larger interest of justice with ITAT-Nagpur Page 1 of 4 ITA No.08/NAG/2020

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD.,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

u/s 153A or 153C, the Jt.CIT (Approving Authority) is required to see that whether the additions have been made in the hands of assessee are based properly on incriminating material found during the course of search, observations/ comments in the appraisal report, the seized documents and further enquiries made by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. Therefore, necessarily

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD.,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

u/s 153A or 153C, the Jt.CIT (Approving Authority) is required to see that whether the additions have been made in the hands of assessee are based properly on incriminating material found during the course of search, observations/ comments in the appraisal report, the seized documents and further enquiries made by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. Therefore, necessarily

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD.,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

u/s 153A or 153C, the Jt.CIT (Approving Authority) is required to see that whether the additions have been made in the hands of assessee are based properly on incriminating material found during the course of search, observations/ comments in the appraisal report, the seized documents and further enquiries made by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. Therefore, necessarily

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD.,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

u/s 153A or 153C, the Jt.CIT (Approving Authority) is required to see that whether the additions have been made in the hands of assessee are based properly on incriminating material found during the course of search, observations/ comments in the appraisal report, the seized documents and further enquiries made by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. Therefore, necessarily

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

u/s 153A or 153C, the Jt.CIT (Approving Authority) is required to see that whether the additions have been made in the hands of assessee are based properly on incriminating material found during the course of search, observations/ comments in the appraisal report, the seized documents and further enquiries made by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. Therefore, necessarily

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

u/s 153A or 153C, the Jt.CIT (Approving Authority) is required to see that whether the additions have been made in the hands of assessee are based properly on incriminating material found during the course of search, observations/ comments in the appraisal report, the seized documents and further enquiries made by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. Therefore, necessarily

ATUL MANOHARRAO YAMSANWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

capital gains because these\nwere created out of bank deposits made in the bank accounts of the\nassessees after the money transferred from the account of M/s. Alfa India.\nNo telescopic benefit have been given as it was out of the source deposited\nin the bank accounts of the assessees. Netting of the money left have also\nnot been considered

UMESH SADASHIV THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

capital gains because these\nwere created out of bank deposits made in the bank accounts of the\nassessees after the money transferred from the account of M/s. Alfa India.\nNo telescopic benefit have been given as it was out of the source deposited\nin the bank accounts of the assessees. Netting of the money left have also\nnot been considered

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR vs. ATUL YAMSANWAR , NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

capital gains because these\nwere created out of bank deposits made in the bank accounts of the\nassessees after the money transferred from the account of M/s. Alfa India.\nNo telescopic benefit have been given as it was out of the source deposited\nin the bank accounts of the assessees. Netting of the money left have also\nnot been considered

YRCE EDUCATE PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

capital gains because these\nwere created out of bank deposits made in the bank accounts of the\nassessee after the money transferred from the account of M/s. Alfa India.\nNo telescopic benefit have been given as it was out of the source deposited\nin the bank accounts of the assessees. Netting of the money left have also\nnot been considered

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR vs. ATUL YAMSANWAR , NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

capital gains because these\nwere created out of bank deposits made in the bank accounts of the\nassessees after the money transferred from the account of M/s. Alfa India.\nNo telescopic benefit have been given as it was out of the source deposited\nin the bank accounts of the assessees. Netting of the money left have also\nnot been considered