RAJESH SARDA,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), NAGPUR
In the result, the addition of undisclosed income under section 68 is deleted
ITA 44/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy(Physical Hearing) Rajesh Sarda, Acit, Central Circle – 2(2), Nagpur 14, Daga Lay–Out, Ambazari Road, Vs Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Nagpur – 440033. Maharashtra – 440001. [Pan: Ahaps4925M] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri K.P. Dewani, Advocate Revenue By Shri Pankaj Kumar, Cit–Dr Date Of Hearing 16.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 24.02.2026 Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income Tax Act
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 153ASection 234ASection 254(1)Section 68Section 69C
234C of I.T. Act 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive.
8) Any other ground shall be prayed at the time of hearing.”
3. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is proprietor of Lakshya Enterprises engaged in the trading of Iron and Steel, filed his return of income for A.Y. 2015–
16 on 30.09.2015 declaring income
