68 results for “bogus purchases”+ Cash Depositclear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 68 · Page 1 of 4
In the result, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed
Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2009-10 The Ito Vs. Ramsingh Balbirsingh Swanni Ward 2(2) Room No. 315, Prop: Industrial Supply Syndicate 3Rd Floor Aayakar Bhawan Bf-2, Amar Vihar, Kamptee Road Telangkhedi Road, Nagpur Civil Lines, Nagpur Pan No.:Aybps 9233 L Appellant Respondent Revenue By :Shri Vitthal M Bhosle Jcit-Dr Assessee By: Shri Abhay Agarwal, Advocate Date Of Hearing: 26/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 21/07/2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Department Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit (A)-4, Nagpur Dated 17/05/2016 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y. 2009-10 Wherein The Department Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.
cash-has-travelled back to the appellant. In such set of facts, the purchases cannot be held to be bogus. Various judicial pronouncements, "made in similar set of facts, support the case of the appellant and have been elaborately discussed in subsequent paragraphs. 9. Also there is merit in the fourth argument of the appellant that he was never given