BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai283Delhi214Bangalore111Karnataka85Chennai65Hyderabad52Kolkata34Cuttack27Jaipur25Indore16Pune10Nagpur7Guwahati5Ahmedabad4Lucknow4Surat4Calcutta3Rajkot2Chandigarh2Varanasi1Ranchi1Jodhpur1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)15Section 194A10Section 2505Section 56(2)(vii)5Deduction5TDS5Limitation/Time-bar5Section 1484Section 271E3Section 269T

INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD -4, AMRAVATI vs. SHRI MAHESH SHANKAR SORATE , DARYAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 250/NAG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)Section 269Section 269TSection 271E

TDS on the commission paid to Shri Bagdi, and for which the commission/ interest amount was disallowed in terms of section 40(a)(ia). 7.5 The appellant has submitted that he had made the repayment by using online cash deposit facility of the bank, which was out of his cash sales, and had insisted on such direct deposits to payee

3
Section 143(3)2

VIJAY VINOD DURAGKAR,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 339/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 148Section 56(2)(vii)Section 69

section 148 of the Act, on the basis of information allegedly received by him from the Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation), New Delhi. AO has not applied his mind so as to come to an independent conclusion that he has reason to believe that income has escaped during the year. 1.4 Fishing enquiry-Information from intelligence wing: Giriraj Enterprises

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 271/NAG/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 269/NAG/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 272/NAG/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONE OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 337/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction

BANK OF INDIA ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 270/NAG/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction