BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

25 results for “TDS”+ Section 268clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi320Mumbai245Bangalore103Karnataka83Chennai76Hyderabad68Ahmedabad38Kolkata37Jaipur31Nagpur25Chandigarh22Visakhapatnam17Raipur15Pune14Lucknow14Patna8Guwahati7Cochin6Indore5Cuttack4Surat4Jodhpur3Calcutta2Jabalpur2Rajkot2Amritsar1Panaji1SC1

Key Topics

Section 234E98TDS24Section 25020Section 20014Penalty14Section 253(1)10Section 253(5)10Condonation of Delay10Section 56(2)(vii)5Section 148

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 141/NAG/2023[2019-20 (Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

4

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 142/NAG/2023[2019-20(Q-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 143/NAG/2023[2019-20 (Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 134/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 136/NAG/2023[2018-19 (Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 135/NAG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 144/NAG/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,GHAZIABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONE OF INCOMDE EF, GAZIABADQQQ.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 137/NAG/2023[2018-19 (Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 138/NAG/2023[2018-19 (Q-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee being ITA no

ITA 140/NAG/2023[2019-20 (Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 253(1)Section 253(5)

TDS statements for the period after 01.06.2015, was empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is valid and the same is Estate Officer Principal Chief Conservator of Forest ITA no.134144/Nag./2023 sustainable. Addition made is confirmed. All the Grounds of Appeal

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 302/NAG/2022[2018-2019 Qtr-4]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 305/NAG/2022[2019-2020 Qtr-2]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 304/NAG/2022[2019-2022 Qtr-1]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 296/NAG/2022[2016-2017 Qtr-2]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 297/NAG/2022[2016-2017 Qtr-3]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 300/NAG/2022[2017-2018 Qtr-3]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 301/NAG/2022[2018-19 Qtr-1]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 303/NAG/2022[2019-2022]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023AY 2019-2022

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 308/NAG/2022[2019-2020 Qtr. 3]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the above fourteen appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 309/NAG/2022[2019-2022 Qtr-4]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200Section 234E

TDS returns. 2. Since the identical facts and common issues are involved in all the above fourteen appeals of the assessee, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. At the outset, the Hob’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shri Rashmikantr Kundalia and Others v. Union of India, 373 ITR 268 (Bom.) while