SHRI SANDEEP SARBATMAL KOTHARI,CHANDRAPUR vs. A.C.I.T., CHANDRAPUR CIRCLE,CHANDRAPUR, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: SHRI S.S.GODARA (Judicial Member), DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE (Accountant Member)

TDS at the time of making advance to the Appellant during AY 2015-16 whereas, the Appellant had accounted for the receipts in subsequent year i.e AY 2016-17 following mercantile system of accounting. 3. Without prejudice to Ground 1, the learned AO & CIT(A) failed to appreciate that, subjecting the receipts of Rs.49

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)WARD-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteasstt Sr

TDS), 5 58/NAG/2020 2012-13 Navnidhi, Tekdi Ward-1(1), Road, Sadar, Nagpur Nagpur–440001. PAN: ABEPA4572G Assessee by Shri Dinesh Jogani – AR Revenue by Shri Rishi Kumar Bisen – DR Date of hearing 01/09/2023 Date of pronouncement 06/10/2023 आदेश/ ORDER PER BENCH : These four appeals filed by the assessee are against the common order of ld.CIT(Appeals)-2, Nagpur dated

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)WARD -1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteasstt Sr

TDS), 5 58/NAG/2020 2012-13 Navnidhi, Tekdi Ward-1(1), Road, Sadar, Nagpur Nagpur–440001. PAN: ABEPA4572G Assessee by Shri Dinesh Jogani – AR Revenue by Shri Rishi Kumar Bisen – DR Date of hearing 01/09/2023 Date of pronouncement 06/10/2023 आदेश/ ORDER PER BENCH : These four appeals filed by the assessee are against the common order of ld.CIT(Appeals)-2, Nagpur dated

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)WARD-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteasstt Sr

TDS), 5 58/NAG/2020 2012-13 Navnidhi, Tekdi Ward-1(1), Road, Sadar, Nagpur Nagpur–440001. PAN: ABEPA4572G Assessee by Shri Dinesh Jogani – AR Revenue by Shri Rishi Kumar Bisen – DR Date of hearing 01/09/2023 Date of pronouncement 06/10/2023 आदेश/ ORDER PER BENCH : These four appeals filed by the assessee are against the common order of ld.CIT(Appeals)-2, Nagpur dated

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)WARD-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteasstt Sr

TDS), 5 58/NAG/2020 2012-13 Navnidhi, Tekdi Ward-1(1), Road, Sadar, Nagpur Nagpur–440001. PAN: ABEPA4572G Assessee by Shri Dinesh Jogani – AR Revenue by Shri Rishi Kumar Bisen – DR Date of hearing 01/09/2023 Date of pronouncement 06/10/2023 आदेश/ ORDER PER BENCH : These four appeals filed by the assessee are against the common order of ld.CIT(Appeals)-2, Nagpur dated

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)WARD-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteasstt Sr

TDS), 5 58/NAG/2020 2012-13 Navnidhi, Tekdi Ward-1(1), Road, Sadar, Nagpur Nagpur–440001. PAN: ABEPA4572G Assessee by Shri Dinesh Jogani – AR Revenue by Shri Rishi Kumar Bisen – DR Date of hearing 01/09/2023 Date of pronouncement 06/10/2023 आदेश/ ORDER PER BENCH : These four appeals filed by the assessee are against the common order of ld.CIT(Appeals)-2, Nagpur dated

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, BSNL RTTC BUILDING vs. THE WARDHA DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD, WARDHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

section 251(1) (a) of the Act empowers the CIT (A) to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment order in the course of disposing the appeal. In the present case, the AO has not followed the instruction of CBDT's instruction no. 20/2015 dated 29/12/2015. Hence, I annulled the assessment order in question. 8. Since the assessment order

PADMAVATI REALITIES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT - PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, ITA.No.251/NAG

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

TDS onc omission expenditure/receipt and other expenses. He, submitted that the learned PCIT has directed the Assessing Officer to inquire into the matter beyond the issue noted in the show cause notice(s) dated 09.03.2024 to the assessees, 9 ITA.Nos.251 254 252 253 & 255 NAG 2024 which is not sustainable in law as held by the Hon’ble Supreme

NEEL INFRATECH,NAGPUR vs. PCIT - PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, ITA.No.251/NAG

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

TDS onc omission expenditure/receipt and other expenses. He, submitted that the learned PCIT has directed the Assessing Officer to inquire into the matter beyond the issue noted in the show cause notice(s) dated 09.03.2024 to the assessees, 9 ITA.Nos.251 254 252 253 & 255 NAG 2024 which is not sustainable in law as held by the Hon’ble Supreme

PADMAVATI REALITIES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT - PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, ITA.No.251/NAG

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

TDS onc omission expenditure/receipt and other expenses. He, submitted that the learned PCIT has directed the Assessing Officer to inquire into the matter beyond the issue noted in the show cause notice(s) dated 09.03.2024 to the assessees, 9 ITA.Nos.251 254 252 253 & 255 NAG 2024 which is not sustainable in law as held by the Hon’ble Supreme

NEEL INFRATECH,NAGPUR vs. PCIT - PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, ITA.No.251/NAG

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

TDS onc omission expenditure/receipt and other expenses. He, submitted that the learned PCIT has directed the Assessing Officer to inquire into the matter beyond the issue noted in the show cause notice(s) dated 09.03.2024 to the assessees, 9 ITA.Nos.251 254 252 253 & 255 NAG 2024 which is not sustainable in law as held by the Hon’ble Supreme

NEEL INFRATECH,NAGPUR vs. PCIT - PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, ITA.No.251/NAG

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

TDS onc omission expenditure/receipt and other expenses. He, submitted that the learned PCIT has directed the Assessing Officer to inquire into the matter beyond the issue noted in the show cause notice(s) dated 09.03.2024 to the assessees, 9 ITA.Nos.251 254 252 253 & 255 NAG 2024 which is not sustainable in law as held by the Hon’ble Supreme

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL COAL INDIA PVT. LTD.,, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

TDS effected on interest paid, PAN no., address etc. of the lenders before the AO in the remand proceedings as well as before me in the appallete proceedings. The details of repayment of loans are also furnished by the assessee. In my considered view that the evidences produced by the assessee proves the genuineness and creditworthiness of the lenders. Once

RAVINDRA MADANLAL KHANDELWAL,AKOLA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE , AKOLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

TDS No. Deducted 1 Amarchand Omprakash Kasat 4,200 - 2 Arihant Corporation 30,667 3,067 3 Ashok Bharatlal Agrawal 1,100 - 4 Ashok Bharatlal Agrawal (HUF) 11,025 1,103 5 Baba Accosiates 1,07,000 10,700 6 Bilala Refinaries 1,02,000 10,200 7 Chandadevi B Khandelwal 73,608 7,361 8 Chetan Ashok Agrawal

ACIT, CHANDRAPUR CIRCLE,, CHANDRAPUR vs. SHRI AVEREL GANGADHAR SHETTY, CHANDRAPUR

The appeal is ALLOWED FOR STATISTCIAL PURPOSES

Bench: Shri Parth Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshali(Through Virtual Hearing From Pune) आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 193/Nag/2017 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2014-15

TDS wrongly made twice amounting to Rs.20,65,367/-, the appellant has not been able to satisfactorily file reconciliation statement and explain the nature of transaction. Therefore, addition amounting to Rs.20,65,367/- out of total addition of Rs.4,45,75,433/- is confirmed. A0 is directed to delete the remaining addition. Ground of appeal is Partly Allowed. (Emphasis supplied

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD.,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

section 68 of the Act in the relevant assessment year. In this regard, we rely on the following case laws:– i) CIT v/s Ayachi Chandrashekhar Narsangji (2014) 42 taxmann.com 251(Guj.) wherein it has been held as under:– 23 Maheshwari Coal Beneficatgion & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. A.Y. 2014–15 to 2020–21 “3. On appeal before the CIT(A) the assessee

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD.,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

section 68 of the Act in the relevant assessment year. In this regard, we rely on the following case laws:– i) CIT v/s Ayachi Chandrashekhar Narsangji (2014) 42 taxmann.com 251(Guj.) wherein it has been held as under:– 23 Maheshwari Coal Beneficatgion & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. A.Y. 2014–15 to 2020–21 “3. On appeal before the CIT(A) the assessee

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

section 68 of the Act in the relevant assessment year. In this regard, we rely on the following case laws:– i) CIT v/s Ayachi Chandrashekhar Narsangji (2014) 42 taxmann.com 251(Guj.) wherein it has been held as under:– 23 Maheshwari Coal Beneficatgion & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. A.Y. 2014–15 to 2020–21 “3. On appeal before the CIT(A) the assessee

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

section 68 of the Act in the relevant assessment year. In this regard, we rely on the following case laws:– i) CIT v/s Ayachi Chandrashekhar Narsangji (2014) 42 taxmann.com 251(Guj.) wherein it has been held as under:– 23 Maheshwari Coal Beneficatgion & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. A.Y. 2014–15 to 2020–21 “3. On appeal before the CIT(A) the assessee