BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

106 results for “TDS”+ Section 25clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,927Delhi2,863Bangalore1,561Chennai1,050Kolkata669Ahmedabad514Hyderabad440Pune404Indore290Jaipur277Cochin270Chandigarh233Raipur225Karnataka195Surat121Nagpur106Rajkot96Cuttack92Visakhapatnam81Lucknow77Amritsar46Jodhpur44Dehradun42Ranchi39Guwahati38Agra30Allahabad29Kerala26Telangana26Panaji25Patna22SC12Jabalpur11Varanasi10Calcutta7Rajasthan5Uttarakhand2Orissa2Bombay1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 234E130Section 200A104TDS73Section 194A56Deduction56Section 143(3)54Section 25047Condonation of Delay41Section 20140Section 201(1)

ITO WARD-1(1) NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. ASHWAMI SALES AND MARKETING PVT.LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 294/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Hitesh P. ShahFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 143(1)Section 194(7)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

Section 194C(6), immunity from TDS under sec. 194C(1) in relation to payments to transporters, applies transporter and non-transporter contractees alike. 25

Showing 1–20 of 106 · Page 1 of 6

31
Section 153A30
Limitation/Time-bar30

BANK OF INDIA ,PRASHEONI BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC,TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 111/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

section 200A which has come in 25 Bank of India effect from 1.6.2015 is having prospective effect and no demand for fee u/s 234E can be made in intimation issued for TDS

BANK OF INDIA,SIHORA BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 104/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

section 200A which has come in 25 Bank of India effect from 1.6.2015 is having prospective effect and no demand for fee u/s 234E can be made in intimation issued for TDS

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR vs. R.B.S.D. AND F.N. DAS (EXPORT FIRM), VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 27/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 115BSection 133ASection 147Section 148Section 44ASection 69C

section 69C being unexplained expenditure to contractors. The A.O., during the assessment proceedings noticed that the appellant has incurred expenditure of ` 1,25,89,787, towards mining expenses. These expenses are on account of extraction of manganese ore to following labour contractors– ` 17,17,000 1 A Appala Swamy 2 D.S. Prakash ` 16,78,687 3 Madhusudana

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 295/NAG/2022[2015-2016 Qtr-4]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.294 & 295/Nag/2022 Assessment Year : 2015-16 Digp Group Centre Crpf, Vs. Dcit, Cpc (Tds), D/O The Office Of The Digp Ghaziabad. Group Centre, Hingna Road, Digdoh Hills, Midc Area, Nagpur- 440019. Pan : Aaagd0143E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kapil Hirani Revenue By : Smt. Rashmi Mathur Date Of Hearing : 17.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 15.12.2021 For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Above Captioned Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.294/Nag/2022 For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent-authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent. 25

DIGP GROUP CENTRE CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC(TDS) , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 294/NAG/2022[2015-2016, Qtr-3]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.294 & 295/Nag/2022 Assessment Year : 2015-16 Digp Group Centre Crpf, Vs. Dcit, Cpc (Tds), D/O The Office Of The Digp Ghaziabad. Group Centre, Hingna Road, Digdoh Hills, Midc Area, Nagpur- 440019. Pan : Aaagd0143E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kapil Hirani Revenue By : Smt. Rashmi Mathur Date Of Hearing : 17.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 15.12.2021 For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Above Captioned Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.294/Nag/2022 For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent-authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent. 25

DCIT-CC-1(3), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. R.B.S.D. AND F.N. DAS(EXPORT FIRM), VIZIANAGRAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 234/NAG/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 37(1)Section 69C

section 69C of the Act for ` 25,06,079. 26. The learned D.R. strongly argued and relied on assessment order. The assessee has incurred various expenses on mining of manganese ore ` 25,06,079. The assesse has not submitted any copy of agreement, nature and proof of service provided of the same and the payment made to these persons

BANK OF INDIA,MAHAL BRANCH NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 160/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

section 201 of the Act is two years from the end of the said financial year 2010-11. Thus, in that case, 25 Bank of India the Assessing Officer is under obligation to pass an order in these circumstances by 31st March, 2013.” 25. Whereas the Assessing Officer passed the order in these 11 appeals in the year

BANK OF INDIA, DONGARGAON NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 153/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

section 201 of the Act is two years from the end of the said financial year 2010-11. Thus, in that case, 25 Bank of India the Assessing Officer is under obligation to pass an order in these circumstances by 31st March, 2013.” 25. Whereas the Assessing Officer passed the order in these 11 appeals in the year

M/S ATASHA ASHIRWAD BUILDERS,NAGPUR vs. A.C.I.T (TDS) RANGE 1, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 480/NAG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 194CSection 200(3)Section 206C(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section 206C(3) of the Act, on or after first day of July, 2012. 25. The learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue has placed strong reliance on the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in Raja Harpal Singh Inter College's case (supra) for the proposition that where the e-TDS

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 189/NAG/2021[2015-16 QUARTER-1]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

25-10-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned Quarters of the assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

DIGP GC CRPF ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCONE TAX. CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 191/NAG/2021[2015-16 Quarter -3]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

25-10-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned Quarters of the assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 190/NAG/2021[2015-16 QUARTER 2]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

25-10-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned Quarters of the assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

DIGP GC CRPF ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 192/NAG/2021[2015-16 QUARTER-4]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

25-10-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned Quarters of the assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

DIGP GC CRPF ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CPP , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 184/NAG/2021[2013-14 Quater--2]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

25-10-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned Quarters of the assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

DIGP GC GRPF,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 187/NAG/2021[2014-15 Quarter-3]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

25-10-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned Quarters of the assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

DIGP GC CRPF ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 188/NAG/2021[2014-15 QUARTER 4]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

25-10-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned Quarters of the assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

DIGP GC CRPF ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS0, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 186/NAG/2021[2014-15 Quarter-1]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

25-10-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned Quarters of the assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

AHSAAN QURESHI,NAGPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 323/NAG/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Sept 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep JainFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 194HSection 201(1)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)Section 40a

TDS is disallowed by not following various judgments Hon High Court and Hon. ITAT that above amendments is curative in nature and intended to remove an undue hardship to the assessee and accordingly given retrospective effect. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT (A) erred by Considering that gross receipt from sale

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in above terms

ITA 342/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

25 326/NAG/2022 Bank of India, -do- 2013-14 Nagpur main Branch 26 327/NAG/2022 Bank of India, -do- 2014-15 Nagpur main Branch 27 328/NAG/2022 Bank of India, -do- 2013-14 Medical College Branch 28 338/Nag/2022 Bank of India, JCIT (OSD),TDS, 2012-13 R.T. Road Branch Circle-1, Nagpur 29 339/Nag/2022 Bank of India, -do- 2013-14 Kamleshwar Branch