BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 244clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai270Delhi236Bangalore142Karnataka87Cochin70Kolkata49Chennai47Raipur43Hyderabad32Jaipur28Ahmedabad26Indore23Lucknow15Chandigarh15Visakhapatnam10Rajkot8Dehradun8Nagpur7Ranchi7Pune5Amritsar5Agra4Cuttack4Surat4Varanasi4Jodhpur2SC2Telangana2Guwahati2Himachal Pradesh2J&K1

Key Topics

Section 80I18Section 143(3)18Section 14712Section 153A12Deduction6Disallowance6Section 683

RAVINDRA MADANLAL KHANDELWAL,AKOLA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE , AKOLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 375/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 144BSection 68

section 68 of the Act following the ratio of above legal proposition. However, exact quantification of amount repaid is subject to factual verification. The Assessing Officer is directed to examine the summary as contained in Page–244 to 246 of the Paper Book furnished by the assessee, which is also reproduced below to easy accessibility:– Ravindra Madanlal Khandelwal ITA no.375/Nag

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. SMT. ANJU SARAF, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue, cross objections of the assessee are dismissed and appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 436/NAG/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Jul 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shrisandeepgosain & Shriarunkhodpia

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh BanthiaFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80I

244 ITR 830 (SC). 17. The learned CIT(A) reversing the order of the Assessing Officer allowed the claim of addition depreciation holding that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lucky Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (supra) by the Assessing Officer is distinguishable on facts. He held that the Assessing Officer has not brought any reason to deviate

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. SMT. ANJU A. SARAF, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue, cross objections of the assessee are dismissed and appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 512/NAG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shrisandeepgosain & Shriarunkhodpia

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh BanthiaFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80I

244 ITR 830 (SC). 17. The learned CIT(A) reversing the order of the Assessing Officer allowed the claim of addition depreciation holding that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lucky Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (supra) by the Assessing Officer is distinguishable on facts. He held that the Assessing Officer has not brought any reason to deviate

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. SMT. ANJU A. SARAF, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue, cross objections of the assessee are dismissed and appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 511/NAG/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Jul 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shrisandeepgosain & Shriarunkhodpia

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh BanthiaFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80I

244 ITR 830 (SC). 17. The learned CIT(A) reversing the order of the Assessing Officer allowed the claim of addition depreciation holding that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lucky Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (supra) by the Assessing Officer is distinguishable on facts. He held that the Assessing Officer has not brought any reason to deviate

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. SMT. ANJU SARAF, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue, cross objections of the assessee are dismissed and appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 438/NAG/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shrisandeepgosain & Shriarunkhodpia

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh BanthiaFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80I

244 ITR 830 (SC). 17. The learned CIT(A) reversing the order of the Assessing Officer allowed the claim of addition depreciation holding that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lucky Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (supra) by the Assessing Officer is distinguishable on facts. He held that the Assessing Officer has not brought any reason to deviate

SMT. ANJU SARAF,,NAGPUR vs. A,C.I.T CENT CIR. 2(2), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue, cross objections of the assessee are dismissed and appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 499/NAG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shrisandeepgosain & Shriarunkhodpia

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh BanthiaFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80I

244 ITR 830 (SC). 17. The learned CIT(A) reversing the order of the Assessing Officer allowed the claim of addition depreciation holding that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lucky Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (supra) by the Assessing Officer is distinguishable on facts. He held that the Assessing Officer has not brought any reason to deviate

SMT. ANJU SARAF,,NAGPUR vs. A,C.I.T CENT CIR. 2(2), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue, cross objections of the assessee are dismissed and appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 498/NAG/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shrisandeepgosain & Shriarunkhodpia

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh BanthiaFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80I

244 ITR 830 (SC). 17. The learned CIT(A) reversing the order of the Assessing Officer allowed the claim of addition depreciation holding that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lucky Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (supra) by the Assessing Officer is distinguishable on facts. He held that the Assessing Officer has not brought any reason to deviate