BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

108 results for “TDS”+ Section 23clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,969Delhi2,869Bangalore1,561Chennai1,039Kolkata670Ahmedabad494Pune438Hyderabad424Indore373Cochin318Jaipur284Chandigarh257Raipur230Karnataka199Surat140Nagpur108Visakhapatnam99Rajkot98Cuttack87Lucknow72Ranchi51Amritsar48Jodhpur41Dehradun38Jabalpur36Guwahati36Agra34Allahabad32Patna26Telangana26Panaji25SC15Varanasi11Kerala10Calcutta8Uttarakhand2Orissa1Rajasthan1Himachal Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 234E116Section 194A88Section 201(1)77TDS75Section 200A63Deduction56Section 25054Section 143(3)53Limitation/Time-bar46Exemption

ITO WARD-1(1) NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. ASHWAMI SALES AND MARKETING PVT.LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 294/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Hitesh P. ShahFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 143(1)Section 194(7)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

23. A plain reading of the above sub-section makes it amply clear that on the Contractor undertaking Transport of Goods in course of his Transport Business, furnishing PAN to the person making such payment/credit, the payee shall not be required to effect TDS

Showing 1–20 of 108 · Page 1 of 6

42
Condonation of Delay40
Section 20139

BANK OF INDIA,SIHORA BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 104/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

section 200A, which is effective from 01.06.2015. In this regard, our reference was drawn to the following table containing the requisite particulars in respect of the TDS statements filed by the respective branches of the assessee wherein the late fee u/s 234E has been levied while processing the TDS statements by the ACIT TDS-CPC and which has been confirmed

BANK OF INDIA ,PRASHEONI BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC,TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 111/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

section 200A, which is effective from 01.06.2015. In this regard, our reference was drawn to the following table containing the requisite particulars in respect of the TDS statements filed by the respective branches of the assessee wherein the late fee u/s 234E has been levied while processing the TDS statements by the ACIT TDS-CPC and which has been confirmed

BANK OF INDIA, DONGARGAON NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 153/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

TDS for 4 quarter of the year, the financial year involved is F.Y. 2009-10 & 2011-12. In that case, the due date for passing of order under sub-section (3)(i) of section 201 of the Act is 2 years from the end of the financial year 2009-10 or 2011-12, as the case may be. Thus

BANK OF INDIA,MAHAL BRANCH NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 160/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

TDS for 4 quarter of the year, the financial year involved is F.Y. 2009-10 & 2011-12. In that case, the due date for passing of order under sub-section (3)(i) of section 201 of the Act is 2 years from the end of the financial year 2009-10 or 2011-12, as the case may be. Thus

DIGP GC CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 295/NAG/2022[2015-2016 Qtr-4]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.294 & 295/Nag/2022 Assessment Year : 2015-16 Digp Group Centre Crpf, Vs. Dcit, Cpc (Tds), D/O The Office Of The Digp Ghaziabad. Group Centre, Hingna Road, Digdoh Hills, Midc Area, Nagpur- 440019. Pan : Aaagd0143E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kapil Hirani Revenue By : Smt. Rashmi Mathur Date Of Hearing : 17.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 15.12.2021 For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Above Captioned Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.294/Nag/2022 For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given by the respondent-Department against all the appellants under Section 200A are so far as they are for the period prior to 1.6.2015 can be said as without any authority under law. Hence, the same can be said as illegal and invalid. 24. If the facts

DIGP GROUP CENTRE CRPF,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CPC(TDS) , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 294/NAG/2022[2015-2016, Qtr-3]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur18 Jul 2023

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.294 & 295/Nag/2022 Assessment Year : 2015-16 Digp Group Centre Crpf, Vs. Dcit, Cpc (Tds), D/O The Office Of The Digp Ghaziabad. Group Centre, Hingna Road, Digdoh Hills, Midc Area, Nagpur- 440019. Pan : Aaagd0143E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kapil Hirani Revenue By : Smt. Rashmi Mathur Date Of Hearing : 17.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’] Dated 15.12.2021 For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Above Captioned Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.294/Nag/2022 For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given by the respondent-Department against all the appellants under Section 200A are so far as they are for the period prior to 1.6.2015 can be said as without any authority under law. Hence, the same can be said as illegal and invalid. 24. If the facts

TARANGAN INFRAVENTRURES PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 234/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 – Shri Saket BhatedFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 5 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-09-2021 & 05-07-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

KIRTI POPATBHAI PATEL,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 152/NAG/2021[F.Y. 2013-14 (Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 – Shri Saket BhatedFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 5 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-09-2021 & 05-07-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

TALUKA AGRICULTURE OFFICER ,CHANDRAPUR vs. ITO, TDS WARD-2(3), CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 86/NAG/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 – Shri Saket BhatedFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 5 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-09-2021 & 05-07-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

TALUKA AGRICULTURE OFFICER,CHANDRAPUR vs. ITO TDS WARD- 2(3), CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 87/NAG/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 – Shri Saket BhatedFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 5 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-09-2021 & 05-07-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

MPA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 91/NAG/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 – Shri Saket BhatedFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 5 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-09-2021 & 05-07-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 200/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-05-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed to hear

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 198/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-05-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed to hear

R.A. QUIDWAIM HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE (SCI & MCVC),CHANDRAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-52(3), CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 170/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-05-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed to hear

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 199/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-05-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed to hear

R.A. QUIDWAIM HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE (SCI & MCVC),CHANDRAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-52(3), CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 171/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-05-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed to hear

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 197/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

23-05-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi upholding the charging of interest u/s. 234E of the Act in respect of above mentioned assessment years. 2. Since, the issues raised in all the appeals are similar basing on the same identical facts. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, we proceed to hear

SMT. ANJU SARAF,,NAGPUR vs. A,C.I.T CENT CIR. 2(2), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue, cross objections of the assessee are dismissed and appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 499/NAG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shrisandeepgosain & Shriarunkhodpia

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh BanthiaFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80I

23(1)(a) for 9 months comes to Rs 35,015/-. After deduction of corporation tax of Rs 12,512/- and deduction u/s 24 not allowed by AD, the taxable income works out to Rs. 15752/-. The Hon'ble ITAT Mumbai Bench in Park Paper Ind (P) Ltd 25 SOT 406, Veena Munganahalli ITA No 251.6 (201.2) & Dr. Balkrishna Naik

SMT. ANJU SARAF,,NAGPUR vs. A,C.I.T CENT CIR. 2(2), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue, cross objections of the assessee are dismissed and appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 498/NAG/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shrisandeepgosain & Shriarunkhodpia

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh BanthiaFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80I

23(1)(a) for 9 months comes to Rs 35,015/-. After deduction of corporation tax of Rs 12,512/- and deduction u/s 24 not allowed by AD, the taxable income works out to Rs. 15752/-. The Hon'ble ITAT Mumbai Bench in Park Paper Ind (P) Ltd 25 SOT 406, Veena Munganahalli ITA No 251.6 (201.2) & Dr. Balkrishna Naik