BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 227clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai317Delhi316Cochin255Bangalore164Karnataka156Chandigarh62Kolkata61Ahmedabad41Chennai38Jaipur33Pune29Raipur25Indore23Hyderabad18Lucknow15Cuttack14Visakhapatnam12Dehradun11Guwahati10Rajkot9Patna8Telangana6Nagpur4Surat4Jodhpur3Kerala3Jabalpur2Amritsar2Ranchi2SC1Panaji1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 406Section 143(3)4Section 69C3Disallowance3Addition to Income3TDS2Condonation of Delay2

GOPAL DENESHCHANDRA TULSHAN ,AKOLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, AKOLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 201/NAG/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Sept 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)Section 201(1)(b)Section 40Section 50

TDS has not been deducted and hence the Assessing Officer has disallowed the pertaining expenses i.e., interest of ` 2,03,227, under section

VIJAY ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WD,-8(4), NAGPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 101/NAG/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Feb 2020AY 2003-04
For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgarwalFor Respondent: Shri Milind Bhusari
Section 143(3)Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS u/s 201(1) is absolute and it is obligatory for the A.O. to levy penalty, when non- compliance of any of the provisions requiring deduction of tax at source is noticed by him. Therefore, the payment of taxes by the payee, cannot provide any immunity from levy of penalty u/s 271C of the Act.” 8. From the above

SHRI DEEPAK SITARAM LADDHAD,BULDHANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AKOLA CIRCLE, AKOLA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Allowed

ITA 375/NAG/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 Nov 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: S.S.Viswanethra Ravi & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.375/Nag/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Shri Deepak Sitaram The Deputy Commissioner Of Laddhad Laddhad Hospital, Vs Income Tax, Akola Circle, Behind Shivaji College, Akola. Wankhede Layoiut, Buldhana – 443001. Pan: Aarpl 4180 F Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri G.J.Ninawe – Dr Date Of Hearing 10/11/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 16/11/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Nagpur Dated 17.07.2017 Emanating From The Order Of The Assessing Officer Dated 14.03.2013. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1] Learned C.I.T.(A) Erred In Confirming The Disallowance The Interest Amounting To Rs.2,80,926/- Out Of Disallowance The Interest Made By A.O. Amounting To Rs.3,69,635/-. 2] Learned C.I.T.(A) Erred In Not Properly Appreciate The Fact Of The Case & Various Submission Filed Before The A.O. & Before Her.

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

227 3. The AO observed that assessee had claimed interest expenditure of Rs.26,53,824/-. The AO calculated notional interest @15% which works out to Rs.3,69,635/- on the interest free advances and disallowed the said amount of Rs.3,69,635/- under section 36(1)(iii) r.w.37(1) of the Act. Aggrieved by the same, assessee filed appeal before

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR vs. R.B.S.D. AND F.N. DAS (EXPORT FIRM), VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 28/NAG/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jan 2025AY 2019-20
For Appellant: \nShri Mukesh AgrawalFor Respondent: \nShri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 44ASection 69C

section 69C of the Act.\n5.\nOn appeal, the learned CIT(A) deleted the addition with following\nobservations:-\n\"4. Discussion and Decision:-\nGround no.3, is regarding addition of ₹ 1,04,27,361, u/s 69C being\nunexplained expenditure to contractors. The A.O., during the assessment\nproceedings noticed that the appellant has incurred expenditure of ₹\n1,04,27,361, towards mining