BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

127 results for “TDS”+ Section 22clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,011Delhi2,975Bangalore1,567Chennai1,095Kolkata698Pune539Hyderabad468Indore423Ahmedabad394Jaipur282Cochin236Raipur224Karnataka221Chandigarh205Patna172Visakhapatnam146Nagpur127Surat107Lucknow85Rajkot84Cuttack63Dehradun48Ranchi46Amritsar41Panaji32Guwahati32Agra30Jodhpur27Telangana27Allahabad26Jabalpur22SC14Varanasi12Kerala10Calcutta5Orissa2Uttarakhand2Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 234E187Section 200A180TDS87Section 194A66Section 25058Deduction54Section 201(1)43Condonation of Delay41Section 20140Section 143(3)

ITO WARD-1(1) NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. ASHWAMI SALES AND MARKETING PVT.LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 294/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Hitesh P. ShahFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 143(1)Section 194(7)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

TDS under sec. 194C(1) in relation to payments to transporters, applies only to a transporter making payment to another sub- contractor submitting his PAN to the former, Section 194C(6) does not give any such indication. Section 194C(6) reads as follows: (6) No deduction shall be made from any sum credited or paid or likely to be credited

Showing 1–20 of 127 · Page 1 of 7

35
Limitation/Time-bar34
Exemption28

BANK OF INDIA,SIHORA BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 104/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

section 200A, which is effective from 01.06.2015. In this regard, our reference was drawn to the following table containing the requisite particulars in respect of the TDS statements filed by the respective branches of the assessee wherein the late fee u/s 234E has been levied while processing the TDS statements by the ACIT TDS-CPC and which has been confirmed

BANK OF INDIA ,PRASHEONI BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC,TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 111/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

section 200A, which is effective from 01.06.2015. In this regard, our reference was drawn to the following table containing the requisite particulars in respect of the TDS statements filed by the respective branches of the assessee wherein the late fee u/s 234E has been levied while processing the TDS statements by the ACIT TDS-CPC and which has been confirmed

SUNILKUMAR RAJENDRA RAI,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 286/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y.Marathe, Sr.Dr
Section 200Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

TDS return under section 200A of the Act. 4. In the present case, the Assessing Officer has levied the late fee under section 234E for delay in filing of Form no.26Q amounting to ` 22

BANK OF INDIA,UMRED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CPC.TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 93/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani a/wFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS return under section 200A of the Act. 4. In the present case, the Assessing Officer has levied the late fee under section 234E for delay in filing of Form no.26Q amounting to ` 22

BANK OF INDIA, PANCHGAON,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 95/NAG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani a/wFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS return under section 200A of the Act. 4. In the present case, the Assessing Officer has levied the late fee under section 234E for delay in filing of Form no.26Q amounting to ` 22

BANK OF INDIA, ARMORI ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 94/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani a/wFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS return under section 200A of the Act. 4. In the present case, the Assessing Officer has levied the late fee under section 234E for delay in filing of Form no.26Q amounting to ` 22

SHRI SANJAY KUMAR SINGH ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 8(1), NAGPUR

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 96/NAG/2020[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Dec 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S. S. Godaraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.96/Nag/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07 Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, Vs. Ito, Ward- 8(1), Nagpur. Hanshu Patel Building, Amravati Road, Wadi, Nagpur- 440023. Pan : Axbps9499K Appellant Respondent Assessee By None : Revenue By : Shri G. J. Ninawe Date Of Hearing : 02.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.12.2022 आदेश / Order Per S. S. Godara, Jm: This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2006-07 Arises Against The Cit(A)-2, Nagpur’S Order Dated 21.08.2019 Passed In Case No. Cit(A)-2/141/2013-14, Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short “The Act”. Case Called Twice. None Appears At Assessee’S Behest. The Very Factual Position Existed On All Previous Hearing As Well. He Is Accordingly Proceeded Ex-Parte.

For Respondent: Shri G. J. Ninawe
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 40

22,133/- on account of his failure to deduct TDS on the alleged truck hire charges payments. 3. Mr. Ninawe vehemently contended that the assessee ought to have deducted TDS on the ground that hire charges paid to various brokers without deducting TDS. He further quotes section

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL FINANCE INDIA P. LTD.,, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 176/NAG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur15 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Sachin V. LuthraFor Respondent: Harshad S. Vengurlekar
Section 10(34)Section 10(35)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 24

section 10(3) of the Act. Ground no.5, raised by the Revenue is thus dismissed by upholding the impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A). 18. Ground no.6, raised by the Revenue relates to the addition of ` 68,02,624, made on account of unexplained unsecured loans. 19. The observations of the learned CIT(A) while deleting the addition

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 197/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

22, Chikhli Layout, Kalamana Road, Bharat Nagar, Nagpur-440008 PAN : AAECN4420E Assessee by : Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir Atal Sl. No. 3 to 6 – Shri K.P. Dewan Revenue by : Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 14-10-2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 14-10-2022 आदेश / ORDER

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 200/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

22, Chikhli Layout, Kalamana Road, Bharat Nagar, Nagpur-440008 PAN : AAECN4420E Assessee by : Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir Atal Sl. No. 3 to 6 – Shri K.P. Dewan Revenue by : Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 14-10-2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 14-10-2022 आदेश / ORDER

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 198/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

22, Chikhli Layout, Kalamana Road, Bharat Nagar, Nagpur-440008 PAN : AAECN4420E Assessee by : Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir Atal Sl. No. 3 to 6 – Shri K.P. Dewan Revenue by : Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 14-10-2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 14-10-2022 आदेश / ORDER

R.A. QUIDWAIM HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE (SCI & MCVC),CHANDRAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-52(3), CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 170/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

22, Chikhli Layout, Kalamana Road, Bharat Nagar, Nagpur-440008 PAN : AAECN4420E Assessee by : Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir Atal Sl. No. 3 to 6 – Shri K.P. Dewan Revenue by : Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 14-10-2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 14-10-2022 आदेश / ORDER

R.A. QUIDWAIM HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE (SCI & MCVC),CHANDRAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-52(3), CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 171/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

22, Chikhli Layout, Kalamana Road, Bharat Nagar, Nagpur-440008 PAN : AAECN4420E Assessee by : Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir Atal Sl. No. 3 to 6 – Shri K.P. Dewan Revenue by : Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 14-10-2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 14-10-2022 आदेश / ORDER

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 199/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

22, Chikhli Layout, Kalamana Road, Bharat Nagar, Nagpur-440008 PAN : AAECN4420E Assessee by : Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir Atal Sl. No. 3 to 6 – Shri K.P. Dewan Revenue by : Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 14-10-2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 14-10-2022 आदेश / ORDER

P.N.DEWALKAR CONSTRUCTION ,NAGPUR vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 242/NAG/2019[2015-16 Quarter-2]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Takkar – (
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS in ITA Nos.2072 & 2073/PUN/2017, order dated 21.12.2017, which has been relied upon by the learned Authorized Representative for the assessee. 13. The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi Vs. Union of India (supra) had also laid down similar proposition that the amendment to section 200A of the Act w.e.f. 01.06.2015 has prospective effect

P.N.DEWALKAR CONSTRUCTION ,NAGPUR vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 243/NAG/2019[2015-16 Quarter -3]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Takkar – (
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS in ITA Nos.2072 & 2073/PUN/2017, order dated 21.12.2017, which has been relied upon by the learned Authorized Representative for the assessee. 13. The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi Vs. Union of India (supra) had also laid down similar proposition that the amendment to section 200A of the Act w.e.f. 01.06.2015 has prospective effect

P.N.DEWALKAR CONSTRUCTION ,NAGPUR vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 240/NAG/2019[2014-15 Quarter -3]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Takkar – (
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS in ITA Nos.2072 & 2073/PUN/2017, order dated 21.12.2017, which has been relied upon by the learned Authorized Representative for the assessee. 13. The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi Vs. Union of India (supra) had also laid down similar proposition that the amendment to section 200A of the Act w.e.f. 01.06.2015 has prospective effect

P.N.DEWALKAR CONSTRUCTION ,NAGPUR vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 239/NAG/2019[2013-14 Quarter4]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Takkar – (
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS in ITA Nos.2072 & 2073/PUN/2017, order dated 21.12.2017, which has been relied upon by the learned Authorized Representative for the assessee. 13. The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi Vs. Union of India (supra) had also laid down similar proposition that the amendment to section 200A of the Act w.e.f. 01.06.2015 has prospective effect

P.N.DEWALKAR CONSTRUCTION ,NAGPUR vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 241/NAG/2019[2014-15 Quarter-4]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Takkar – (
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS in ITA Nos.2072 & 2073/PUN/2017, order dated 21.12.2017, which has been relied upon by the learned Authorized Representative for the assessee. 13. The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi Vs. Union of India (supra) had also laid down similar proposition that the amendment to section 200A of the Act w.e.f. 01.06.2015 has prospective effect