BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

36 results for “TDS”+ Section 206Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune295Indore269Bangalore240Delhi184Chennai155Raipur62Mumbai61Ahmedabad57Kolkata46Cuttack40Jaipur38Nagpur36Rajkot35Jodhpur28Cochin28Karnataka26Jabalpur23Lucknow19Surat18Chandigarh14Panaji10Hyderabad8Dehradun8Himachal Pradesh6Visakhapatnam5Amritsar5Guwahati4Telangana2Varanasi2SC1Calcutta1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 234E83Section 206C44TDS36Section 200A24Section 14A10Section 271H8Section 206C(7)7Section 115W6Survey u/s 133A6Section 251

BULDANA URBAN CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION(JV),BULDHANA vs. I.T.O. (TDS)1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 176/NAG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur13 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon’Ble

Section 206C

section 206C(7) of the Act with regard to charging of interest was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 and was thus not applicable to any years prior to that. 8. The AOP and its members are not separate entities, therefore no TCS was required to be collected from its member. Even, in the remand report, learned CIT(A) has admitted

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRAUCTION (J.V). ,BULDHANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 164/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur13 Jul 2018AY 2010-11

Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

5
Penalty5
Addition to Income4

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon’Ble

Section 206C

section 206C(7) of the Act with regard to charging of interest was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 and was thus not applicable to any years prior to that. 8. The AOP and its members are not separate entities, therefore no TCS was required to be collected from its member. Even, in the remand report, learned CIT(A) has admitted

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (J.V),BULDANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 166/NAG/2018[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur11 Jul 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon’Ble

Section 206C

section 206C(7) of the Act with regard to charging of interest was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 and was thus not applicable to any years prior to that. 8. The AOP and its members are not separate entities, therefore no TCS was required to be collected from its member. Even, in the remand report, learned CIT(A) has admitted

BULDANA URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITD AND NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (J.V),BULDANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , TDS WARD 1(2), AKOLA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 165/NAG/2018[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur11 Jul 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon’Ble

Section 206C

section 206C(7) of the Act with regard to charging of interest was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 and was thus not applicable to any years prior to that. 8. The AOP and its members are not separate entities, therefore no TCS was required to be collected from its member. Even, in the remand report, learned CIT(A) has admitted

I.T.O.(T.D.S.) WARD 2(3), CHANDRAPUR vs. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD UNIT AWARPUR CEMENT WORKS,

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 345/NAG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi

Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 201

TDS in compliance with provisions of section 194C(6) is required to be cancelled. In Such facts, tne action or the Id. AO of raising the demand

SHEPHALI ANIL MALVIYA,NAGPUR vs. DCIT,CPC,TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeals (Ms

ITA 115/NAG/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe, CIT–DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S HLA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. DY, CIT(TDS) CIR. 1, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal for A

ITA 542/NAG/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri NareshJakhotia, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR
Section 133ASection 206C

TDS) ..…….………. Respondent Circle–1, AayakarBhawan Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Assessee by : Shri NareshJakhotia, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR Date of Hearing – 20.04.2022 Date of Order – 21.04.2022 2 M/s. HLA Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. M/s. BHLA Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. O R D E R PER BENCH The captioned appeals have been filed by two different assessee

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 213/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S RAJYAS SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 208/NAG/2019[214-15 (Q-4(26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 215/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q-4 - 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 210/NAG/2019[2013-14 Q3-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 214/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q-3-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 216/NAG/2019[2015-16 Q1-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 209/NAG/2019[2013-14-Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 217/NAG/2019[2015-16 Q2-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 212/NAG/2019[2014-15 Q1-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

M/S CHAMPAK MINES AND MINERALS ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 111 appeals preferred by the different assessees

ITA 211/NAG/2019[2013-14 Q4-(26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 234E

206C sub-section (3) proviso that when the assessee has deducted TDS, he has to deposit the amount in the Government

HASANTE BURHANIAH FIDAYYIAH TRUST,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals for A

ITA 9/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe, CIT–DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

TDS provisions stringent which is a charging section and Sec. 200A on the other hand is a machinery provision for making prima facie adjustment. The Hon'ble Court in the case of Rajesh Kourani vs Union of India (supra) held that:- 16, We now come to the petitioner's central challenge viz. of non permissibility to levy fee under section

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,,NAGPUR vs. I.T.O. T.D.S. WARD 2-(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 102/NAG/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Mahavir Singh

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Loya, CAFor Respondent: Shri R.K. Baral, Senior DR
Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 206CSection 206C(7)

Section 206C(1C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’). For this, the assessee, in all the five years, has raised identically worded grounds, and the grounds as raised in ITA No.102/Nag/2017 for assessment year 2011-12 read as under :- “1. That the order passed u/s 206C(6A) and 206C(7) by the learned Income Tax Officer TDS

M/S ATASHA ASHIRWAD BUILDERS,NAGPUR vs. A.C.I.T (TDS) RANGE 1, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 480/NAG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 194CSection 200(3)Section 206C(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section 206C(3) of the Act, on or after first day of July, 2012. 25. The learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue has placed strong reliance on the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in Raja Harpal Singh Inter College's case (supra) for the proposition that where the e-TDS