Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

142 results for “TDS”+ Section 201clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,592 Delhi1,555 Bangalore1,109 Chennai652 Kolkata465 Karnataka257 Pune173 Jaipur162 Raipur153 Nagpur142 Ahmedabad141 Hyderabad141 Indore105 Cochin99 Chandigarh62 Surat46 Lucknow45 Jodhpur45 Rajkot41 Jabalpur39 Panaji36 Kerala28 Visakhapatnam27 Telangana27 Cuttack24 Agra19 Amritsar17 Patna17 SC13 Dehradun10 Guwahati9 Ranchi9 Varanasi8 Himachal Pradesh6 Rajasthan3 Orissa3 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 J&K1

Key Topics

Section 194A178 Section 201(1)170 TDS97 Section 25090 Section 20187 Deduction85 Condonation of Delay74 Limitation/Time-bar65 Exemption60 Section 271C

BANK OF INDIA,MAHAL BRANCH NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 160/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

TDS statements were filed as referred to in section 200 of the Act. The Ld. AR further drawn our reference to the provisions of section 201

BANK OF INDIA, DONGARGAON NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 153/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

TDS statements were filed as referred to in section 200 of the Act. The Ld. AR further drawn our reference to the provisions of section 201

Showing 1–20 of 142 · Page 1 of 8

...

26

BANK OF INDIA ,PRASHEONI BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC,TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 111/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

TDS(Ghaziabad) ..…….………. Respondent Uttar Pradesh–201 010 Assessee by : Shri Hardik Chordia, CA & Shri Pratik Sadrani, CA Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M.Bhosale, JCIT Date of Hearing – 03.06.2022 Date of Order – 06.06.2022 O R D E R PER BENCH: These are appeals filed by Bank of India, the assessee, in respect of its forty three different branches spread across its zonal

BANK OF INDIA,SIHORA BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 104/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

TDS(Ghaziabad) ..…….………. Respondent Uttar Pradesh–201 010 Assessee by : Shri Hardik Chordia, CA & Shri Pratik Sadrani, CA Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M.Bhosale, JCIT Date of Hearing – 03.06.2022 Date of Order – 06.06.2022 O R D E R PER BENCH: These are appeals filed by Bank of India, the assessee, in respect of its forty three different branches spread across its zonal

INDOWORTH INDIA LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), CIRCLE 51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 4/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri R.K. GaneriwalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

section 201(3) the Financial Act, 2012. 3. The non–deduction TDS and interest thereon u/s 201(1) and 201

M/S INDOWORTH INDIA LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), CIRCLE 51(1) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 3/NAG/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri R.K. GaneriwalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

section 201(3) the Financial Act, 2012. 3. The non–deduction TDS and interest thereon u/s 201(1) and 201

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 277/NAG/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryassessment Year : 2012-13 Bank Of India, Dcit (Tds), Hingna Branch, Nagpur Zonal Office, Vs. Circle-1, 3Rd Floor, Csd Dept., Kingsways, Nagpur Nagpur – 440 001, Maharashtra Pan : Aaacb0472C Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal

Section 194ASection 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 201(3)(i)Section 250

section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted four cases, as tabulated on page 4 of his order, where interest paid was more than

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 392/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 387/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRICLE-51(10, NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 388/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 366/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 364/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 391/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 389/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 361/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 363/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 360/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 365/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 359/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 362/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground