BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 197clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi361Mumbai286Bangalore272Chennai122Karnataka114Raipur87Kolkata81Chandigarh62Hyderabad60Jaipur53Ranchi29Ahmedabad24Lucknow16Jodhpur16Indore13Surat12Cuttack10Pune9Varanasi8Allahabad7Guwahati6Nagpur6Cochin6Rajkot5Telangana4Visakhapatnam3Jabalpur3Patna3SC3Agra1

Key Topics

Section 234E36Section 200A30TDS6

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 198/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A of the Act is not applicable, therefore, the order of CIT(A) is not justified in upholding the order passed u/s. 200A confirming the levy of fee u/s. 234E of the Act by the AO for default in furnishing TDS statement for A.Y. 2013-14 and it is set aside. 6. In the result, the appeal of assessee

R.A. QUIDWAIM HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE (SCI & MCVC),CHANDRAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-52(3), CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 171/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A of the Act is not applicable, therefore, the order of CIT(A) is not justified in upholding the order passed u/s. 200A confirming the levy of fee u/s. 234E of the Act by the AO for default in furnishing TDS statement for A.Y. 2013-14 and it is set aside. 6. In the result, the appeal of assessee

R.A. QUIDWAIM HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE (SCI & MCVC),CHANDRAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-52(3), CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 170/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A of the Act is not applicable, therefore, the order of CIT(A) is not justified in upholding the order passed u/s. 200A confirming the levy of fee u/s. 234E of the Act by the AO for default in furnishing TDS statement for A.Y. 2013-14 and it is set aside. 6. In the result, the appeal of assessee

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 197/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A of the Act is not applicable, therefore, the order of CIT(A) is not justified in upholding the order passed u/s. 200A confirming the levy of fee u/s. 234E of the Act by the AO for default in furnishing TDS statement for A.Y. 2013-14 and it is set aside. 6. In the result, the appeal of assessee

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 199/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A of the Act is not applicable, therefore, the order of CIT(A) is not justified in upholding the order passed u/s. 200A confirming the levy of fee u/s. 234E of the Act by the AO for default in furnishing TDS statement for A.Y. 2013-14 and it is set aside. 6. In the result, the appeal of assessee

NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 200/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Sl. No. 1 & 2 – Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Sl. No. 1 to 6 – Shri G.J. Ninawe
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A of the Act is not applicable, therefore, the order of CIT(A) is not justified in upholding the order passed u/s. 200A confirming the levy of fee u/s. 234E of the Act by the AO for default in furnishing TDS statement for A.Y. 2013-14 and it is set aside. 6. In the result, the appeal of assessee