M/S INDOWORTH INDIA LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), CIRCLE 51(1) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

section 133A(2A) conducted on 09/12/2019, at the office premises, which is our firm opinion is belated and unsustainable and is hereby quashed. However, we are in full agreement with the contentions of the learned A.R. for the assessee and the case laws relied upon by him are squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. Hence, insofar

M/S PYRAMID DEVELOPERS,NAGPUR vs. JOINT CIT RANGE 1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri G. Manjunatha

133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) was carried out at the premises of the assessee on 19th January 2011. A survey action resulted into detection of incriminating documents impounded as per Annex. B–1 and B–2. Shri Gunwant Sudamrao Deopare, Director of M/s. Pyramid Arcades Pvt. Ltd., in the course of his statement recorded

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR vs. R.B.S.D. AND F.N. DAS (EXPORT FIRM), VIZIANAGARAM

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

133A of the Act was conducted at the business premises of the assessee no 25/08/2021. The case was selected for scrutiny under section 147 of the Act and statutory notices under section 148 of the Act was issued in response to which the assessee filed return of income on 11/04/2023, declaring total income at ₹ 13,19,49,823. The case

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR vs. R.B.S.D. AND F.N. DAS (EXPORT FIRM), VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

133A of the Act was conducted at the business premises of the Radhika Group on 25/08/2021. The case was selected for scrutiny under section 147 of the Act and statutory notices under section 148 of the Act was issued in response to 3 R.B.S.D. And F.N. Das (Export Firm) ITA no.27/Nag./2024 which the assessee filed return of income

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX-CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR vs. RADHIKA METALS AND MINERALS, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") was conducted in Radhika Group of cases on 13/04/2023. Subsequently, notice under section 148 of the Act was issued in response to which the assessee filed its return of income on 30/04/2023, and declaring total income of ₹ 3,11,36,784. The case was selected for scrutiny and ultimate the assessment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(2), NAGPUR vs. VIDARBHA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

section 133(6) and confirmed of providing services to the assessee company and receipt of payment from it. They also provided copy of agreement, their bank statements and audited financial statements. In the assessment order Id. AO held that though the two companies have shown this amount as income in their P&L a/c but they are majorly engaged

M/S HLA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. DY, CIT(TDS) CIR. 1, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal for A

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

TDS) ..…….………. Respondent Circle–1, AayakarBhawan Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Assessee by : Shri NareshJakhotia, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR Date of Hearing – 20.04.2022 Date of Order – 21.04.2022 2 M/s. HLA Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. M/s. BHLA Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. O R D E R PER BENCH The captioned appeals have been filed by two different assessee

INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS) WARD, WARDHA, NAGPUR vs. M/S VARCO ASSOCIATES, YAVATMAL

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

133A was carried out in the case of assessee. Thereafter on spot verification carried out on 24-10-2013 certain documents were found that indicate the assessee has made payment of interest to 156 persons in lieu of unsecured loans taken from the aforesaid persons. The assessee had not deducted tax on source on such payment of interest. However, neither

ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3),, CHANDRAPUR vs. ACC LTD.,, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.73 To 76/Nag/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2014-15 Ito (Tds), Ward-2(3), Vs. Acc Ltd., Chandrapur- 442401. Chanda Cement Works, P.O. Cement Nagar, Chandrapur, Dist.- Chandrapur, Chandrapur - 442502. Pan : Aaact1507C Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Maurya Pratap Assessee By : Shri Chaitanya D. Joshi Date Of Hearing : 20.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Directed Against The Common Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Nagpur [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 26.12.2016 Quashing The Order Passed By The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Ward-2(3), Chandrapur U/S 201(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2014-15 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In The Above Captioned Four Appeals Of The Revenue, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal Of The Revenue In Ita No.73/Nag/2017 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 Are Stated Herein.

133A of the Act were conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 17.10.2014 in order to verify the compliance of TDS provisions of the Act and various payments made by the assessee. During the course of such survey operations, the TDS Officer had found that no tax at source was deducted on transport charges paid to transport contractors

ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3),, CHANDRAPUR vs. ACC LTD.,, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.73 To 76/Nag/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2014-15 Ito (Tds), Ward-2(3), Vs. Acc Ltd., Chandrapur- 442401. Chanda Cement Works, P.O. Cement Nagar, Chandrapur, Dist.- Chandrapur, Chandrapur - 442502. Pan : Aaact1507C Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Maurya Pratap Assessee By : Shri Chaitanya D. Joshi Date Of Hearing : 20.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Directed Against The Common Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Nagpur [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 26.12.2016 Quashing The Order Passed By The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Ward-2(3), Chandrapur U/S 201(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2014-15 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In The Above Captioned Four Appeals Of The Revenue, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal Of The Revenue In Ita No.73/Nag/2017 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 Are Stated Herein.

133A of the Act were conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 17.10.2014 in order to verify the compliance of TDS provisions of the Act and various payments made by the assessee. During the course of such survey operations, the TDS Officer had found that no tax at source was deducted on transport charges paid to transport contractors

ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3),, NAGPUR vs. ACC LTD.,, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.73 To 76/Nag/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2014-15 Ito (Tds), Ward-2(3), Vs. Acc Ltd., Chandrapur- 442401. Chanda Cement Works, P.O. Cement Nagar, Chandrapur, Dist.- Chandrapur, Chandrapur - 442502. Pan : Aaact1507C Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Maurya Pratap Assessee By : Shri Chaitanya D. Joshi Date Of Hearing : 20.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Directed Against The Common Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Nagpur [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 26.12.2016 Quashing The Order Passed By The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Ward-2(3), Chandrapur U/S 201(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2014-15 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In The Above Captioned Four Appeals Of The Revenue, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal Of The Revenue In Ita No.73/Nag/2017 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 Are Stated Herein.

133A of the Act were conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 17.10.2014 in order to verify the compliance of TDS provisions of the Act and various payments made by the assessee. During the course of such survey operations, the TDS Officer had found that no tax at source was deducted on transport charges paid to transport contractors

ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3),, CHANDRAPUR vs. ACC LTD.,, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.73 To 76/Nag/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 To 2014-15 Ito (Tds), Ward-2(3), Vs. Acc Ltd., Chandrapur- 442401. Chanda Cement Works, P.O. Cement Nagar, Chandrapur, Dist.- Chandrapur, Chandrapur - 442502. Pan : Aaact1507C Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Maurya Pratap Assessee By : Shri Chaitanya D. Joshi Date Of Hearing : 20.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Directed Against The Common Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Nagpur [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 26.12.2016 Quashing The Order Passed By The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Ward-2(3), Chandrapur U/S 201(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2014-15 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In The Above Captioned Four Appeals Of The Revenue, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal Of The Revenue In Ita No.73/Nag/2017 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 Are Stated Herein.

133A of the Act were conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 17.10.2014 in order to verify the compliance of TDS provisions of the Act and various payments made by the assessee. During the course of such survey operations, the TDS Officer had found that no tax at source was deducted on transport charges paid to transport contractors

DCIT-CC-1(3), NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. R.B.S.D. AND F.N. DAS(EXPORT FIRM), VIZIANAGRAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

133A of IT act was conducted at premises of the assessee on 25.08.2021. Assessee filed return of income on 13.02.2022 declaring total income of Rs. 18,01,81,210/-. Case was selected for scrutiny and notice under section 143(2) and 142(1) were issued which were duly replied by the assessee. In the assessment order passed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AKOLA, NAGPUR vs. RBSD AND FN DAS, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the Revenue stands dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

TDS. The Assessing Officer has not found any defect in the documents produced by the assessee nor has the Assessing Officer falsified these documents. It is also undisputed that the assessee has sold goods worth ` 55,15 crore during the relevant previous year. Without employing labourer through contractors such sales would not have been possible. The Assessing Officer

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDLAL B MALOO, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s cross objection is partly allowed

Bench: Shri P.K. Bansal & Shri Amarjit Singh

section 148 of the Act was issued on 12th May 2008. The Assessing Officer has reopened the assessment on the ground that investment in shares of IFSL amounting to ` 2,75,000, was made in cash and the purported source of such investment namely withdrawal from M/s Nandlal Enterprises, was not verifiable with reference to the books of account

M/S BALAJI VENTURES PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. DY, CIT(TDS) CIR. 1, NAGPUR

Bench: Sh. Vikram Singh Yadav & Sh. Yogesh Kumar U.S.M/S. Balaji Ventures Pvt. Ltd. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income “Krishna House”, Tax (Tds), 71/A, S.T.Bus Vs. Circle-1, Nagpur Stand Road, Ganeshpeth, Nagpur-440 018 Pan: Ngpd0 2781C (Respondent) (Appellant)

TDS), 71/A, S.T.Bus Vs. Circle-1, Nagpur Stand Road, Ganeshpeth, Nagpur-440 018 PAN: NGPD0 2781C (RESPONDENT) (APPELLANT) Appellant by Sh. NareshJakhotia, CA Respondent by Sh. VitthalBhosale,Jt. CIT-DR Date of Hearing 06.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement 08.06.2022 ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JM This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income