BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

227 results for “TDS”+ Section 13(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,160Mumbai4,045Bangalore2,109Chennai1,389Kolkata991Pune589Hyderabad515Ahmedabad496Jaipur351Raipur328Indore305Karnataka280Chandigarh257Cochin257Nagpur227Surat189Visakhapatnam171Rajkot125Lucknow93Cuttack80Amritsar66Patna51Ranchi48Dehradun46Agra37Telangana36Guwahati35Jodhpur32Panaji31Jabalpur19SC19Allahabad17Kerala13Calcutta9Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan5Varanasi5Uttarakhand3Orissa2Punjab & Haryana2J&K2Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194A162Section 201(1)142Section 20199TDS98Section 25096Condonation of Delay89Deduction87Limitation/Time-bar71Section 200A66Exemption

ITO WARD-1(1) NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. ASHWAMI SALES AND MARKETING PVT.LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 294/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Hitesh P. ShahFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 143(1)Section 194(7)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

13,00,980/- claimed as expense towards Carriage Outward, treating such expense disallowable under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act 8. Assessee contended before the learned CIT that because of the provision of Section 194C(6), she was not liable to deduct TDS

Showing 1–20 of 227 · Page 1 of 12

...
61
Section 197A32
Section 19126

BANK OF INDIA,SIHORA BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 104/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

13 and accordingly, late filing fee of Rs. 12,200/– levied by the Assessing Officer (CPC–TDS) under section 234E for the delay in filing the statement under section 26Q as well as interest u/s 220(2) was upheld. For arriving at such a finding, the ld. 16 Bank of India CIT(A) relied on the decision

BANK OF INDIA ,PRASHEONI BRANCH vs. ACIT,CPC,TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 111/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

13 and accordingly, late filing fee of Rs. 12,200/– levied by the Assessing Officer (CPC–TDS) under section 234E for the delay in filing the statement under section 26Q as well as interest u/s 220(2) was upheld. For arriving at such a finding, the ld. 16 Bank of India CIT(A) relied on the decision

SUNILKUMAR RAJENDRA RAI,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 286/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y.Marathe, Sr.Dr
Section 200Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

8 years during which the appellant would have filed many TDS forms, TDS returns, Income Tax Returns etc on portal and it is not acceptable that the accountant failed to notice the impugned order, 2. It is the responsibility of the person, who is supposed to make compliance as per law and not his employee or his counsel, to ensure

DAMMANI INDUSTRIES,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD, TDS 51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 121/NAG/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Smt. Veena AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 200ASection 220Section 220(2)Section 234E

13. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds:– “1. Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) is justified in affirming the levy of late filing penalty u/s 234E of the Income Tax Act for the relevant year consideration. 2. Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) is justified in affirming an order in the contravention of the trite law settled by judicial

SHEPHALI ANIL MALVIYA,NAGPUR vs. DCIT,CPC,TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeals (Ms

ITA 115/NAG/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe, CIT–DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS so filed in Form no.26Q for Q2 of the financial 2012–13 levying a late filing fee of `.57,800, under section 234E of the Act. The assessee being aggrieved with the order of the Assessing Officer, filed appeal before the first appellate authority. 5. The learned CIT(A) confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer by observing

BANK OF INDIA,UMRED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CPC.TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 93/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani a/wFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 200ASection 234E

13 2013–14 relevant to the assessment year 2013–14 and 2014–15 respectively. Bank of India, Panchgaon Branch ITA no.93/Nag./2023 ITA no.94/Nag./2023 ITA no.95/Nag./2023 5. When these appeals were taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the Co–ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, has decided the issue

BANK OF INDIA, PANCHGAON,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 95/NAG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani a/wFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 200ASection 234E

13 2013–14 relevant to the assessment year 2013–14 and 2014–15 respectively. Bank of India, Panchgaon Branch ITA no.93/Nag./2023 ITA no.94/Nag./2023 ITA no.95/Nag./2023 5. When these appeals were taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the Co–ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, has decided the issue

BANK OF INDIA, ARMORI ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 94/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur01 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani a/wFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 200ASection 234E

13 2013–14 relevant to the assessment year 2013–14 and 2014–15 respectively. Bank of India, Panchgaon Branch ITA no.93/Nag./2023 ITA no.94/Nag./2023 ITA no.95/Nag./2023 5. When these appeals were taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the Co–ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, has decided the issue

BANK OF INDIA,MAHAL BRANCH NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 160/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

13 Bank of India 8. In this regard, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee in respect of its Itwari Branch filed quarterly TDS statement in Form 26Q for Q1 on 16.09.2010, for Q2 on 25.06.2011, for Q3 on 15.01.2011 and for Q4 on 17.05.2011. It was submitted that all these TDS statements were filed as referred to in section

BANK OF INDIA, DONGARGAON NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 153/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

13 Bank of India 8. In this regard, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee in respect of its Itwari Branch filed quarterly TDS statement in Form 26Q for Q1 on 16.09.2010, for Q2 on 25.06.2011, for Q3 on 15.01.2011 and for Q4 on 17.05.2011. It was submitted that all these TDS statements were filed as referred to in section

HASANTE BURHANIAH FIDAYYIAH TRUST,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeals for A

ITA 9/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe, CIT–DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

8 followed. Reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble ITAT Delhi Bench in the case of Shri Raj Veer Singh vs ACIT vide order dated 09/07/2021. H) Levy of Fee u/s 234E be cancelled.” 10. Insofar as grounds no.1 and 2, are concerned, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that – “2. Ground No.1 &2 : Order passed

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRICLE-51(10, NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 388/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

8. 366/NAG./2022 2014-15 Bank of India, Takalghat Bhawvan, Civil Branch 9. 386/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Hudkeshwar Branch Lines, Nagpur 10. 387/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Kadbichowk Branch 11. 388/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Mahal Branch PIN 440 001 2013-14 12. 389/NAG./2022 Bank of India, Somalwada Branch 13. 391/NAG./2022

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 386/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

8. 366/NAG./2022 2014-15 Bank of India, Takalghat Bhawvan, Civil Branch 9. 386/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Hudkeshwar Branch Lines, Nagpur 10. 387/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Kadbichowk Branch 11. 388/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Mahal Branch PIN 440 001 2013-14 12. 389/NAG./2022 Bank of India, Somalwada Branch 13. 391/NAG./2022

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 389/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

8. 366/NAG./2022 2014-15 Bank of India, Takalghat Bhawvan, Civil Branch 9. 386/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Hudkeshwar Branch Lines, Nagpur 10. 387/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Kadbichowk Branch 11. 388/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Mahal Branch PIN 440 001 2013-14 12. 389/NAG./2022 Bank of India, Somalwada Branch 13. 391/NAG./2022

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 364/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

8. 366/NAG./2022 2014-15 Bank of India, Takalghat Bhawvan, Civil Branch 9. 386/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Hudkeshwar Branch Lines, Nagpur 10. 387/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Kadbichowk Branch 11. 388/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Mahal Branch PIN 440 001 2013-14 12. 389/NAG./2022 Bank of India, Somalwada Branch 13. 391/NAG./2022

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 363/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

8. 366/NAG./2022 2014-15 Bank of India, Takalghat Bhawvan, Civil Branch 9. 386/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Hudkeshwar Branch Lines, Nagpur 10. 387/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Kadbichowk Branch 11. 388/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Mahal Branch PIN 440 001 2013-14 12. 389/NAG./2022 Bank of India, Somalwada Branch 13. 391/NAG./2022

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 387/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

8. 366/NAG./2022 2014-15 Bank of India, Takalghat Bhawvan, Civil Branch 9. 386/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Hudkeshwar Branch Lines, Nagpur 10. 387/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Kadbichowk Branch 11. 388/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Mahal Branch PIN 440 001 2013-14 12. 389/NAG./2022 Bank of India, Somalwada Branch 13. 391/NAG./2022

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 365/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

8. 366/NAG./2022 2014-15 Bank of India, Takalghat Bhawvan, Civil Branch 9. 386/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Hudkeshwar Branch Lines, Nagpur 10. 387/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Kadbichowk Branch 11. 388/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Mahal Branch PIN 440 001 2013-14 12. 389/NAG./2022 Bank of India, Somalwada Branch 13. 391/NAG./2022

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 360/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

8. 366/NAG./2022 2014-15 Bank of India, Takalghat Bhawvan, Civil Branch 9. 386/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Hudkeshwar Branch Lines, Nagpur 10. 387/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Kadbichowk Branch 11. 388/NAG./2022 2013-14 Bank of India, Mahal Branch PIN 440 001 2013-14 12. 389/NAG./2022 Bank of India, Somalwada Branch 13. 391/NAG./2022