BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 10Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore210Delhi197Mumbai186Chennai50Raipur38Kolkata28Hyderabad21Pune13Jaipur10Ahmedabad8Karnataka5Nagpur5Rajkot2Cuttack2Surat2Visakhapatnam1Guwahati1Kerala1Patna1Telangana1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 1030Exemption4Section 80P(2)2Section 143(2)2Section 143(3)2

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5, NAGPUR vs. THE NIRMAL UJWAL CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal for the A

ITA 391/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur27 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Vikash Agrawal
Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

section 10A the addition made on account of the disallowance of the provident fund/ESIC payments ought to be ignored 5 The Nirmal Ujwal Credit Co–operative Society Ltd. A.Y.2014–15 cannot be accepted. No statutory provision to that effect having been made, the plain consequence of the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer must follow. The second question shall accordingly

MOHAN BALIRAMJI THAKRE,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, DELHI

ITA 375/NAG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

For Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 10

10A) and sec.10(10AA) exemption(s). 6. I find no merit in the Revenue’s foregoing vehement stand. This is for the precise reason that so far as the assessees’ claim of having employer-employee relationship with the Maharashtra State Government since having employed with the then Maharashtra State Electricity Board is concerned, hon’ble Madras high court

SHRI ASHOK MAHADEORAO GAWHANDE,BULDHANA vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

ITA 10/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

For Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 10

10A) and sec.10(10AA) exemption(s). 6. I find no merit in the Revenue’s foregoing vehement stand. This is for the precise reason that so far as the assessees’ claim of having employer-employee relationship with the Maharashtra State Government since having employed with the then Maharashtra State Electricity Board is concerned, hon’ble Madras high court

DILIP RAJESHWAR RAJKONDAWAR,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, NFAC, DELH

ITA 118/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

For Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 10

10A) and sec.10(10AA) exemption(s). 6. I find no merit in the Revenue’s foregoing vehement stand. This is for the precise reason that so far as the assessees’ claim of having employer-employee relationship with the Maharashtra State Government since having employed with the then Maharashtra State Electricity Board is concerned, hon’ble Madras high court

SUBHASHI YADAORAO CHIMURKAR,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3), NAGPUR

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 168/NAG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: For Revenue : Shri Abhay Y Marathe, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y Marathe, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 143(3)

10A) and sec.10(10AA) exemption(s). 6. I find no merit in the Revenue’s foregoing vehement stand. This is for the precise reason that so far as the assessees’ claim of having employer-employee relationship with the Maharashtra State Government since having employed with the then Maharashtra State Electricity Board is concerned, hon’ble Madras high court